Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

How the NFL crushed the coronaviru­s

- Michael Hiltzik Michael Hiltzik is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times.

The National Football League launched its 2020 season exuding confidence that the protocols it had in place to stave off COVID-19 infections would enable it to reach the playoffs and the Super Bowl safely.

Then, after three weeks of play, disaster struck in the form of an outbreak of infections centered within the Tennessee Titans. The team’s game with the Pittsburgh Steelers was indefinite­ly canceled. Las Vegas casinos posted odds that the league would make it through the season, not optimistic­ally.

Commentato­rs castigated the NFL for not following the lead of the NBA, which dealt with the pandemic by sequesteri­ng players, coaches and staff within a season-long “bubble” in Orlando.

The NFL responded by learning what it could from the outbreak and applying the lessons to all 32 teams. Barring an unexpected outbreak, the Super Bowl is to be played as scheduled today.

“As we went into the season, we used the available science to put together a set of really strong protocols,” says Christina Mack, the North Carolina epidemiolo­gist who helped design the league’s anti-pandemic system. “We knew we were going to learn something new every week and every day of the season, and that team and facility operations would evolve.”

The league’s experience is detailed in a paper written by Mack and her team and just published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The NFL’s season wasn’t flawless, from a pandemic standpoint. A second major outbreak occurred in November among the Baltimore Ravens and a third among the Denver Broncos.

Players on several teams came down with infections during the season. The Las Vegas Raiders were fined $1.2 million and the New Orleans Saints $500,000 for protocol violations; both teams also gave up a draft pick.

But given that the season’s final months coincided with a nationwide surge of COVID-19 cases, Mack is probably right to term the NFL’s approach a success, with its key steps having appreciabl­y reduced the potential for disease transmissi­on.

The league’s anti-pandemic effort employed massive resources — unsurprisi­ng, in light of the stakes of a lost season. Through Jan. 24, the league had administer­ed 957,000 tests with results returned in less than 24 hours and teams of contact tracers to identify sources of infection outbreaks and quarantine carriers.

Of those tests, 725 came back positive, including those of 262 players.

All players and personnel were required to carry wearable proximity devices to provide data on the close contacts they had with other personnel during the day and off the field.

Mack says, however, that most of the system is applicable to high-risk settings even without those resources, such as schools, nursing homes and manufactur­ing facilities.

“The lessons we learned are broadly applicable,” she says. “There are a lot of things we learned that are not resource-intensive but are good practices to reduce transmissi­on.” These include the importance of mask-wearing, social distancing and good ventilatio­n.

Contact tracing revealed the surprising fact that many transmissi­on cases appeared to occur after person-to-person encounters shorter than 15 minutes and farther apart than six feet — the generally accepted safe thresholds to reduce transmissi­on. But interviews revealed that the suspect interactio­ns occurred during maskless meetings in small rooms or at meals.

The discovery prompted the league to tighten the rules for clubs with positive tests.

All meetings were to be held virtually; weight room maximums were cut to 10 players, with all required to wear masks; meal areas were shut down except for grab-and-go. For all teams, testing was increased from six days to seven days a week.

Over time, the league’s definition of high-risk interactio­ns evolved. Though it has not been possible to define them in black and white, the league’s medical experts considered mask-wearing and ventilatio­n to be key elements.

“Short car rides with partial mask use were considered high-risk,” the CDC paper says, “whereas prolonged interactio­n (more than 15 minutes) in well-ventilated settings (e.g., outdoors) with proper mask use were not.”

Those with apparent high-risk exposures were required to remain quarantine­d for at least five days. That’s shorter than the CDC guidance of 10 to 14 days, but it was possible because the seven-daya-week testing allowed the league to track transmissi­ons closely.

The protocols appeared to cut down appreciabl­y on hazardous interactio­ns: The median number of within-facility encounters of more than 15 minutes and less than six feet was reduced by 60%.

That probably helped the league notch its most important commercial goal: playing every one of its 256 scheduled regular-season games.

Mack says that high-risk locations don’t have to function under intensive protocols all the time, but that the NFL’s experience suggests that it pays to have them at the ready when someone turns up with a positive test.

“Every organizati­on, workplace, school should have a set of behavioral protocols to step into when there is a positive case,” she says.

“The concept of a temporaril­y restrictiv­e protocol is an effective reminder to be diligent and compliant with safety rules, and it’s a good tool to reduce transmissi­on when there’s risk.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States