Las Vegas Review-Journal

High cost keeping body cameras off many police

Managing, storing video help push the price of technology

- Karaoke 8 p.m. Tuesday and Wednesday, 3300 Las Vegas Blvd. South, 702-894-7147. BY JAKE GROVUM

WASHINGTON — As the nationwide push intensifie­s for police to wear body cameras, states and cities have encountere­d one consistent roadblock to adopting the technology: the cost.

The price of a single camera ranges widely, from less than $100 to more than $1,000, based on the size of the purchase (larger police department­s often get a discount) and whether the deal includes data storage services. But managing and storing the video costs many times the price of the cameras themselves. And because the technology is so new, it’s likely that it will have to be replaced fairly quickly, which would require additional expenditur­es.

In a survey of 40 police department­s by the Police Executive Research Forum conducted last fall and released this year, nearly 40 percent of department­s without body cameras cited cost as the primary barrier to using them.

President Barack Obama has called for $75 million in new federal spending to help pay for 50,000 police body cameras for local police department­s. States are struggling with whether cameras should be worn all the time and whether the video should be a public record, which also can affect costs. As of April 20, 34 states were considerin­g 117 bills related to police body cameras, according to the National Conference of State Legislatur­es (NCSL). So far, only a handful of states have figured out how to pay for them.

“They (cameras) can be a really great tool if implemente­d correctly,” said Lindsay Miller, a senior research associate at the police forum, a membership organizati­on of police and government officials, academics and others who work in the field. “It’s not as easy as sticking a camera on an officer and sending them out in the field.”

Put simply, Miller said, “the money has to come from somewhere.”

In New Jersey, legislatio­n enacted last fall requires officers or the vehicles they routinely use in traffic stops to have cameras, either on the officer or on the dashboard in the car.

Giving local government­s the option —

 ?? L.E. BASKOW (2014) ?? Investigat­ive Specialist Dino Davis describes the significan­t parts of the bodyworn camera now being put to the test by Metro Police officers.
L.E. BASKOW (2014) Investigat­ive Specialist Dino Davis describes the significan­t parts of the bodyworn camera now being put to the test by Metro Police officers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States