Las Vegas Review-Journal

Chipotle’s GMO message is muddled

-

Let’s unpack this burrito bowl. Chipotle Mexican Grill last week became the first large U.S. restaurant chain to declare it would not use any geneticall­y engineered ingredient­s in its menu offerings. The fast-food giant stated its position with a bold section of its website: “A farewell to GMOs: When it comes to our food, geneticall­y modified ingredient­s don’t make the cut.” If you’re new to the acronym, the O stands for organisms, as in, the origins of the foods we eat.

We applaud Chipotle’s ambition to use healthy ingredient­s. For years, the restaurant has touted its commitment to serving “food with integrity” by offering a menu of mostly tacos and burritos using just a few dozen ingredient­s that are — as much as possible — fresh, locally sourced and free of additives and hormones.

It’s not easy, as nearly every sprig of cilantro, tomatillo and black bean is part of a larger agricultur­al process that’s difficult to monitor. Scroll deeper into the Chipotle website and you’ll learn that, in fact, many of the beverages sold at Chipotle do contain GMOs (in the high-fructose corn syrup), and some of the meat and dairy served at Chipotle is “likely to come from animals given at least some GMO feed.” Still, they’re trying.

What troubles us is that Chipotle has embraced the fearmonger­ing of some food, environmen­tal and health activists who have turned “GMO” into a dirty word. By declaring its goal to eliminate GMO food from its kitchens, Chipotle may be pleasing its health-conscious guacamole fans, but it is missing an opportunit­y to educate them on the nuances of food science.

Genetic engineerin­g, like the science behind vaccines and climate change, is easy to misunderst­and. The biotechnol­ogy companies that pioneered this research have done a poor job of explaining advancemen­ts to the public over the 30 years since the first slow-ripening tomatoes were developed. (Perhaps they thought that Gregor Mendel had already paved that path with his pea plants a century earlier.) And aggressive Big Food companies, led by Monsanto, have provoked pushback — by watchdogs in the U.S. who say Big Food cares more about profit than public health and by European Union countries protective of their own agricultur­al interests.

Concerns about the politics and business ethics of the agricultur­e industry are separate and valid issues that should not be muddled into an oversimpli­fied stance on food science.

Let’s keep the focus on the science. Ample research and decades of experience have shown that geneticall­y modified crop technology is safe. The challenge, which we encourage Chipotle to address, is that GMO represents a vast range of applicatio­ns. Packing them all together makes for easy marketing (Chipotle’s “G-M-Over It” line is cute), but it unfairly discounts the important — and safe — contributi­ons that biotechnol­ogy is making to global food security.

Onesuccess­story:“goldenrice.”Through genetic engineerin­g, this new type of rice contains beta-carotene, the source of vitamin A, which is severely lacking in the diets of millions in Africa and Asia. The scientists who developed it were just honored with a Patents for Humanity award by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

That might be too much to take in over a chicken burrito, but we urge Chipotle to try.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States