Las Vegas Review-Journal

But how will they get there?

LVCVA touches on transit issues as it OKS expansion plan

- By Richard N. Velotta Las Vegas Review-journal

Just before the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority board of directors voted unanimousl­y, as expected, to approve proceeding on a $1.4 billion expansion and renovation project for the Las Vegas Convention Center, some board members offered a few sobering remarks.

With all the hundreds of thousands of people coming to Las Vegas to participat­e in the dozens of new trade shows the expansion is likely to generate, not to mention hundreds of thousands more who will attend events at the planned Las Vegas stadium, how are the people expected to get around?

Before the 10-0 vote on the project that had its origins more than a decade ago, Las Vegas Mayor Carolyn Goodman asked questions that were on the periphery of both project debates.

“I’ve seen it in San Diego and Orlando,” Goodman said. “The ability to move the people easily from one part of the city to another is critical. Somewhere out there, that needs to be a part of what we’re doing.”

Coming in 2020

Policymake­rs will have a few years to think about it with the timeline for the completion of the stadium ending in the summer of 2020 and the expansion phase of the convention project scheduled for completion by theendofth­atyear.

While the Las Vegas Monorail serves the Convention Center, there’s a lack of surface transporta­tion to the facility, and parking will be diminished with the new exhibit hall. The stadium also lacks parking and nearby transporta­tion.

The Southern Nevada Tourism Infrastruc­ture Committee last year discussed transporta­tion systems as a need, and the Regional Transporta­tion Commission of Southern Nevada recently received authority to explore the constructi­on of a light-rail system. But the system

under considerat­ion would serve the Maryland Parkway corridor from Mccarran Internatio­nal Airport to downtown Las Vegas and wouldn’t touch the convention center or the stadium site.

There was no suspense over whether the board would approve the convention center project when itcametoav­otetuesday.two boards, the seven-member Oversight Panel for Convention Facilities in Clark County and the sevenmembe­r Las Vegas Convention District Committee, made unanimous affirmativ­e recommenda­tions for the project over the past three weeks.

Four board members — Henderson Councilman John Marz and

casino industry representa­tives Chuck Bowling of MGM Resorts Internatio­nal, Tom Jenkin of Caesars Entertainm­ent and Maurice Wooden of Wynn Resorts — didn’t attend the meeting.

Two phases

Approval of the project, split into two phases, means LVCVA administra­tors can go to work seeking a constructi­on manager that will be responsibl­e for delivering the first phase — an $860 million, 600,000-square-foot exhibition hall which will be placed on what currently is referred to as the Gold and Diamond parking lots, most likely

LVCVA

However, he said that he would build the complex as condos listed for rent, and that he’s trying to line up financing.

When seeking out-of-town funding, he said, you “have to sell Vegas before you sell the location.”

The vacant 10-acre site was once home to Falconi’s Tropicana Honda, and during the go-go years last decade, a luxury high-rise complex called Pinnacle Las Vegas was planned there.

The $850 million condo-hotel project by the Falcon Group called for two 36-story towers packed with amenities and linked with three levels of sky bridge suites.

Falcon wasn’t the only one looking to build opulent towers back then: With the valley awash in easy money, investors pitched plans for dozens of

high-rises as part of the “Manhattani­zation” of Las Vegas.

Marketing materials for Pinnacle show plans for 1,104 units, a hibiscussh­aped pool, a quarter-mile garden jogging path, a spa, a putting green, executive loft offices and restaurant­s.

Moreover, a “digital concierge service” would have let residents “perform an array of tasks with the touch of a button. Summon the valet to retrieve your car, change the temperatur­e of your bedroom, play your favorite music selections, schedule a tee time” and more.

The developers announced in mid2006 that they “secured” the “first level of project financing,” and work crews cleared the site in summer 2007. But like most proposed towers from those days, Pinnacle never came out of the ground.

New York’s Petra Capital Management acquired the site through foreclosur­e in spring 2013 and sold it months later to current owner Syn-

cept Real Estate in Southern California, property records show.

Syncept chief executive Fangbin “Fred” Jiang referred questions about Victorson’s project to the site’s listing broker, Mark Anthony Rua of ERA Brokers Consolidat­ed, who did not return calls seeking comment.

Pinnacle’s former developmen­t director, Michael Bellon, said that lenders wanted his group to presell perhaps 55 percent of the units before they’d release the first pot of funds. The developers found buyers for around 48 percent of the units, he said, but projects began to get canceled “everywhere” in Las Vegas, and Pinnacle’s builders lost their funding and scrapped the project.

Pinnacle would have been “an interestin­g place to live,” Bellon said. But “timing is everything.”

Contact Eli Segall at esegall@ reviewjour­nal.com or 702-383-0342. Follow @eli_segall on Twitter.

 ?? Erik Verduzco ?? Las Vegas Review-journal Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority board members Bill Noonan, left, and Lawrence Weekly during a LVCVA meeting on Tuesday.
Erik Verduzco Las Vegas Review-journal Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority board members Bill Noonan, left, and Lawrence Weekly during a LVCVA meeting on Tuesday.
 ??  ?? Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority
Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States