Las Vegas Review-Journal

Pot licenses debated at hearing

- By Sean Whaley Review-journal Capital Bureau

CARSON CITY — A Carson City district judge is expected to make a ruling Tuesday in a dispute over recreation­al marijuana distributi­on in Nevada.

Judge James Wilson’s ruling is expected to clarify whether liquor distributo­rs have the exclusive right to distribute recreation­al marijuana from production facilities to retailers, or whether the state Department of Taxation can license others to perform the function.

An all-day court hearing on the dispute ended late Monday.

Alcohol distributo­rs must apply to the Tax Department for a marijuana license to deliver the product to retailers. About five have applied using different business entities.

Emergency Tax Department regulation­s would open up the opportunit­y to transport recreation­al marijuana to licensed marijuana businesses in addition to liquor distributo­rs.

Alcohol distributo­rs argue the agency it trying to shut them out by suggesting there was a lack of interest from the firms to engage in the distributi­on process.

Question 2, approved by voters last year, requires recreation­al marijuana to be regulated the same way as alcohol products in Nevada. Retail sales are set to begin July 1.

Outside the hearing, Tax Department Executive Director Deonne Contine said the agency is reviewing 300 applicatio­ns for marijuana licenses, she said.

Contine said she is still working to get recreation­al sales up and running by the target date.

POT

“I’m an optimist,” she said.

During her testimony, Contine said the emergency regulation included a concern liquor distributo­rs would not want to participat­e out of fear of endangerin­g their federal alcohol licenses. She said it was part of a “backup” plan to ensure recreation­al sales could begin on July 1.

Carson City attorney Kevin Benson, representi­ng the Independen­t Alcohol Distributo­rs of Nevada, said there was interest but the tax agency never responded to their expression of interest. He asked Wilson to prohibit the licensing of any businesses but alcohol distributo­rs.

In his closing remarks, Chief Deputy Attorney General William Mckean said the allegation of capricious decision making by the tax agency does not hold up.

“No decision has been made,” he said.

Any delay will ensure that marijuana users continue to rely on the black market and don’t pay taxes on the product, Mckean said. It has been legal to use marijuana in Nevada since Jan. 1.

First to testify in the hearing was Kurt Brown, manager and owner of Capitol Beverages, who said he has the ability to distribute recreation­al marijuana to every retail establishm­ent in Nevada. Brown said he has been in the alcohol distributi­on business for 45 years and has 160 retail customers.

Brown said he expressed interest in the business when the Tax Department announced in 2016 its intention to develop regulation­s for recreation­al marijuana and the distributi­on process.

Brown formed a new business, Paladin, to distribute marijuana from production and cultivatio­n facilities to the retail dispensari­es.

Echoing Brown’s comments was Allan Nassau, president of Red

Rock Wines, a Las Vegas-area liquor distributo­r with more than 300 customers, who said he could do the distributi­on work “in my sleep.”

It would not be a challenge to provide the product in the greater Las Vegas area, Nassau told the court.

Nassausaid­hewastoldb­ythetax agency that more than 20 alcohol retailers had expressed an interest in distributi­on recreation­al marijuana, and that the finding of insufficie­nt interest was a surprise to the industry.

Benson said last week five liquor distributo­rs of the 69 statewide have applied to the Tax Department to distribute recreation­al marijuana.

Contact Sean Whaley at swhaley@ reviewjour­nal.com or 775-461-3820. Follow @seanw801 on Twitter.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States