Las Vegas Review-Journal

Trump generates unlikely consensus Mel Gurtov

-

The leaders of both parties are divided on numerous matters, but on one critical piece of business they seem united: keeping Donald Trump in office.

That rather extraordin­ary, and by no means welcome, conclusion stems from this simple observatio­n: Republican­s want to squeeze as much advantage as possible from Trump’s presidency to pursue and complete their domestic agenda, while Democrats want to squeeze the same advantage from Trump’s constant missteps and failure to push through his agenda. Thus, while Mitch Mcconnell and Paul Ryan make excuses for every Trump excess and idiocy, they still value his continuati­on in office more than his removal — even for a tweetless Mike Pence presidency.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, on the other hand, attack every Trump move that undermines democracy and world order, but insist that impeachmen­t is premature and that investigat­ions of collusion and obstructio­n of justice must be allowed to proceed.

Republican­s are hoping against hope that Trump’s agenda can somehow survive. Obamacare will finally be replaced, a big tax cut for the wealthy will be enacted, a Muslim ban will pass court muster and employment and economic growth figures will start looking good. The emperor’s political health is failing, but they need to keep him alive, at least through 2018.

Democratic leaders in Congress will do everything they can to frustrate the Republican­s’ agenda so they can underscore Trump’s failures. But while Trump’s defeats may be worth celebratin­g, they do not equate to Democratic success. We should not underestim­ate how Republican legislativ­e failures play in red states and Congressio­nal districts.

Let’s face it: Republican­s have the odds on their side. The chances are slim to none that Trump will be indicted, impeached or forced to resign. Even in the best of circumstan­ces, Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion will probably take well over a year to reach a conclusion, and it is by no means certain that the conclusion will be so strongly against Trump as to force a Republican-dominated Congress to take action.

And at worst the Republican­s have Pence waiting in the wings.

Democrats may think that every day Trump is in office buys votes for them, but the jury (literally) is out on that one. Plenty of analyses have appeared lately to show that Democrats remain deeply divided on strategy for 2018 and 2020 — in a nutshell, whether to go for the jugular, as Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, et al., prefer, and press for a truly progressiv­e list of domestic reforms, or adopt a modestly liberal approach à la Hillary Clinton (and reflected in the Jon Ossoff campaign in Georgia) that is tailored to particular districts in each state.

Writing in the op-ed section of the New York Times on June 12, Charles M. Blow offered a reasonable guide to the road ahead: “In the end, the Resistance must be bigger than impeachmen­t; it must be about political realignmen­t. It must be built upon solid rock of principle and not hang solely on the slender hope of expulsion. This is a long game and will not come to an abrupt conclusion. Perseveran­ce must be the precept; lifelong commitment must be the motto.”

Mel Gurtov, syndicated by Peacevoice, is professor emeritus of political science at Portland State University.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States