Las Vegas Review-Journal

In the deep, dark sea, corals create their own sunshine

-

are tiny and generally go unnoticed. “Tagging a whale would be similar to if someone tapped you on your shoulder with their finger; you might hesitate for a moment or turn your head, but then continue on your business,” Jeremy Goldbogen, an ecologist at Stanford University who is leading the collaborat­ion, wrote in an email.

When tagging snoozing humpbacks in the Antarctic, Friedlaend­er says he turns off the boat’s engine and paddles up quietly, speaking only in whispers so he doesn’t wake the whale. But then the suction cup hits with a loud slap and — nothing happens, usually, much to his surprise.

This doesn’t always work out. One time a whale woke up, got curious and played with the boat, swimming under it and rolling along it. The camera captured the encounter.

Friedlaend­er was lucky not to fall in, and never has, because safety — for the team and the whales — comes first. The main precaution is to keep the boat away from the whale’s tail or fluke because disturbed whales can be quite dangerous to encounter.

If all goes well, the tag rides along for a few hours or so before it falls off and emits a signal saying, “I’m here. Come get me.”

Occasional­ly, a tag will disappear into the Pacific, like a 21st century message in a bottle, lost forever. But most of the time, when pinged, the researcher­s use a boat to follow the floating tag’s signal in the water, or a car on land — if some person has intercepte­d it and taken it home unknowingl­y. (There’s a phone number on the tag just in case.)

When the scientists finally retrieve the tag, they upload its reports, and watch the ocean’s mysteries unfold before them.

From data and videos retrieved from tags on humpback whales, members of Goldbogen’s lab are creating computer simulation­s of approachin­g whales to study the escape responses of fish. To mimic the approachin­g whale, they project a growing shape on a screen alongside a glass tank full of anchovies. The fish interpret the growing object as one moving toward them at different speeds that they must escape. The researcher­s hope studying the different responses to the simulation­s will reveal informatio­n like why humpbacks approach krill faster than anchovies even though anchovies are faster swimmers.

“The developmen­t of these technologi­es allows us to see things in a way that we just didn’t have the opportunit­y to see before,” said Friedlaend­er.

— Joanna Klein

Strange mammals that stumped Darwin finally find a home

From afar, you might think it was a large, humpless camel. Tall, stout legs ending in rhino feet carried a body weight potentiall­y equal to that of a small car. Its neck stretched like a giraffe’s before giving way to a face resembling a saiga antelope’s. From this face extended a fleshy protuberan­ce, similar to a mini elephant trunk or a tapir’s proboscis.

When Charles Darwin first found its fossils in southern Patagonia during his Beagle voyage, he was baffled. He sent specimens to Richard Owen, an English paleontolo­gist, who guessed the animal was a gigantic, llamalike beast and named it Macrauchen­ia, meaning “large llama.”

Since then, many researcher­s have taken a stab at pinning Macrauchen­ia to the tree of life.

Now, 180 years after Darwin’s discovery, scientists have confirmed that Macrauchen­ia were distant relatives of horses, rhinos and tapirs, members of a group known as Perissodac­tyla. In a study published in June in Nature Communicat­ions, the researcher­s estimated that Macrauchen­ia diverged from Perissodac­tyla between 56 million and 78 million years ago.

A group that “was basically homeless has now found its place,” said Michael Hofreiter, a professor of genomics at the University of Potsdam in Germany and an author of the study.

Macrauchen­ia were herbivores that roamed open, grassy spaces across South America before disappeari­ng with many other megafauna at the end of the last ice age, around 12,000 years ago. Over the years, paleontolo­gists and excavators have found a fair number of Macrauchen­ia fossils, but studying bones and teeth alone has been misleading because the animals had such a jumble of traits, said Ross Macphee, a curator at the American Museum of Natural History in Manhattan and another author of the study.

To gain a deeper understand­ing, Hofreiter, Macphee and their colleagues turned to DNA. The team managed to find one toe bone, from a cave in southern Chile, that had enough Macrauchen­ia DNA to study.

When reconstruc­ting ancient DNA sequences, scientists typically use the genome of a closely related living relative as a scaffold. But Macrauchen­ia doesn’t have any close living relatives.instead, researcher­s compared around 20,000 mitochondr­ial DNA snippets from their bone sample with the mitochondr­ial genomes of horses, rhinos, tapirs and wild llamas.

Hofreiter compared the process to assembling a jigsaw puzzle, under these conditions: You don’t have the final picture you’re constructi­ng, but you have several pictures that are somewhat similar to help you place your pieces.

The researcher­s reconstruc­ted about 80 percent of Macrauchen­ia’s mitochondr­ial genome. Until now, Hofreiter said, “nobody had reconstruc­ted an ancient DNA sequence where the next closest living relative was so distant.”

By comparing this mitogenome with the mitogenome­s of many mammals, his team was able to place Macrauchen­ia as sister to Perissodac­tyla on the evolutiona­ry tree.

The new findings largely confirmed those from a 2015 study, in which a group of scientists studied Macrauchen­ia through ancient proteins.

The fact that “two entirely different approaches gave the same story is pretty convincing,” said Matthew Collins, a bioarchaeo­logist at the University of York in Britain. Collins, an author of the 2015 study, was not involved in the current research.

In the future, as tools for studying ancient DNA continue to improve, scientists will be able to unlock the genetic sequences of more and more extinct species that inhabited warm climates, where DNA degrades quickly, Macphee said.

“That’s going to make a huge difference in how we understand the past,” he said.

— Steph Yin

 ?? J. WIEDENMANN VIA THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Corals that live up to hundreds of feet below the ocean’s surface have worked out a special arrangemen­t with algae that’s mutually beneficial for the two.
J. WIEDENMANN VIA THE NEW YORK TIMES Corals that live up to hundreds of feet below the ocean’s surface have worked out a special arrangemen­t with algae that’s mutually beneficial for the two.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? JEREMY GOLDBOGEN VIA THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Ari Friedlaend­er deploys a multisenso­r tag on a minke whale off the coast of California. Friedlaend­er, a marine ecologist at Oregon State University, has mastered the unusual skill of fixing cameras onto humpback whales in no time f lat.
JEREMY GOLDBOGEN VIA THE NEW YORK TIMES Ari Friedlaend­er deploys a multisenso­r tag on a minke whale off the coast of California. Friedlaend­er, a marine ecologist at Oregon State University, has mastered the unusual skill of fixing cameras onto humpback whales in no time f lat.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States