Las Vegas Review-Journal

OSHA recommends fines for Speedvegas over crash

- By Richard N. Velotta Las Vegas Review-journal

Speedvegas had a substandar­d fire and safety plan and failed to properly train employees in fire suppressio­n, but that wasn’t a contributi­ng factor in an accident that killed two people in February, Nevada’s Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion office reported.

The agency, which reviewed the crash as a workplace accident, recommende­d fines totaling $16,000 on three citations involving seven violations.

Speedvegas CEO Aaron Fessler acknowledg­ed receiving documents and said the company is evaluating its next steps.

“We take safety concerns seriously and will continue to maintain the safest experience available,” Fessler said in an emailed statement.

SPEEDVEGAS

“We are pleased that these citations say nothing to indicate that the track design or safety procedures are substandar­d,” he said. “We were not surprised that OSHA did not cite these areas because our driving experience is unique among similar driving opportunit­ies.”

An inspection narrative for an investigat­ion completed July 25 also said the agency did not have the resources to reach a conclusion on whether the installati­on of aftermarke­t brakes on the Lamborghin­i Aventador involved in a crash at the track south of Las Vegas was a direct cause of the accident.

No track standards

The agency also said there were no applicable standards for track design that apply to Speedvegas. After the fiery Feb. 12 accident in which Canadian tourist Craig Sherwood and track driving instructor Gil Ben-kely died, critics said they believed the design of the track to be unsafe. Speedvegas officials maintained that the track was safe and reopened 12 days after the accident.

The Las Vegas Review-journal received a redacted inspection narrative and the citation and notificati­on of penalties Monday through requests to Nevada OSHA.

Speedvegas received the hand-delivered citations by certified mail on Wednesday and could contest them and the penalties within 15 working days of that delivery — by Aug. 17.

The citations listed two serious violations with proposed fines of $7,000 and $4,000, two “other-than-serious” violations and three regulatory notices, each including proposed fines of $1,000 each.

A list of violations and proposed penalties was discussed by OSHA officials in a July 25 meeting with Speedvegas executives Darren Strahl, executive vice president of operations, and Johnny Mcmahon, chief operating officer.

Companies cited by OSHA are given the opportunit­y to challenge or appeal proposed citations and penalties.

Violation details

Seven issues were noted in three citations proposed by OSHA:

■ Serious violation: Speedvegas

did not provide training and education for all fire brigade members. Such training is necessary before they perform fire brigade emergency activities. Must be abated by Aug. 15. Proposed penalty: $7,000.

■ Serious violation: Speedvegas provided portable fire extinguish­ers for employee use in the workplace and but did not provide an educationa­l program on their use. Abatement date: Aug. 10. Proposed penalty: $4,000.

■ Other-than-serious violation: Speedvegas was required to have a workplace hazard assessment with written certificat­ion. On the date of the accident, there was no certificat­ion that fire and safety teams members had the assessment. Abatement date: Aug. 5. Proposed penalty: $1,000.

■ Other-than-serious violation: On the date of the accident, SpeedVegas had not prepared a required organizati­onal statement establishi­ng the existence of a fire brigade. Abatement date: Aug. 5. Proposed penalty: $1,000.

■ Regulatory notice: At the time of the accident, Speedvegas did not have a safety committee, a requiremen­t of an employer with more than 25 employees. Abatement date: Aug. 5. Proposed penalty: $1,000.

■ Regulatory notice: At the time of the accident, Speedvegas did not have a written safety program that includes an explanatio­n of the methods used to identify, analyze and control new and existing hazardous conditions. Abatement date: Aug. 5. Proposed penalty: $1,000.

■ Regulatory notice: At the time of the accident, Speedvegas did not have a written safety program that listed procedures that must be followed to investigat­e an accident which has occurred and the corrective actions that would be initiated. Abatement date: Aug. 5. Proposed penalty: $1,000.

The inspection narrative explaining the investigat­ion said because the car burst into flames after hitting a concrete wall, the lack of a properly trained fire brigade was not considered a contributi­ng factor in the fatal accident.

Brake replacemen­ts

Another part of the investigat­ion involved Speedvegas’ decision to replace the factory-issued carbon ceramic brakes on the Aventador with aftermarke­t two-piece aluminum and cast-iron brake rotor assemblies manufactur­ed by Bellingham, Washington-based Girodisc.

Fessler told OSHA investigat­ors that using the Girodisc assemblies was preferred because of the high amount of high-speed braking that is inherent in high-performanc­e car experience­s like his. He said the carbon ceramic brakes wouldn’t be as effective with continuous highspeed braking as the replacemen­t system.

OSHA investigat­ors tried to find and review video recordings of the accident, but there were no cameras aimed at the crash site.

“Nevada OSHA does not specialize in vehicle braking components nor do we have recognized standards for motor vehicles and as a result, I could not determine whether the (Girodisc) rotors and pads were a direct cause of the accident, nor determine if they were inferior,” the report narrative said.

OSHA had similar comments about the track design.

Not a racetrack

Fessler told investigat­ors Speedvegas is a driving track, not a racetrack, and cars don’t run simultaneo­usly. It was designed by Robert Barnard, who consulted standards posted by Paris-based Federation Internatio­nale de l’automobile, for its design, but Speedvegas is not an Fia-sanctioned track.

Because OSHA can only measure standards based on local statutes and codes, the track’s design was not an issue.

“After reviewing local statutes, codes, standards and other recognized industry standards, I determined that there were no applicable standards at the time of the accident for the track use and track design at Speedvegas,” the report narrative said.

Said Fessler: “Our experience represents the most thoughtful, safe, well-designed motorsport­s experience of its kind, anywhere in the world. Safety always has been and always will be the top priority. While we may not agree with the proposed citations, we have worked well with OSHA and are evaluating our next steps like any responsibl­e employer.”

Contact Richard N. Velotta at rvelotta@reviewjour­nal.com or 702477-3893. Follow @Rickvelott­a on Twitter.

 ?? Elizabeth Brumley ?? Las Vegas Review-journal OSHA said in its report there were no track standards to apply to Speedvegas.
Elizabeth Brumley Las Vegas Review-journal OSHA said in its report there were no track standards to apply to Speedvegas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States