Las Vegas Review-Journal

Kathleen Rest David Michaels

-

The U.S. government has tried for decades — and with considerab­le success — to make workplaces safer; to provide free access to research, informatio­n and guidelines to inform best practices for businesses of all sizes; and to enforce the law when unscrupulo­us companies put workers at risk.

In a flurry of recent activity aimed at cutting the budget and rolling back protection­s, the Trump administra­tion is compromisi­ng worker safety. If you work, or know someone who does, you need to pay attention — people’s lives are literally at stake.

People like 25-year-old Donovan Weber who suffocated in a trench collapse in Minnesota. Or Michael Mccort, Christophe­r Irvin, Antonio Navarrete and Frank Lee Jones who were killed at a power plant in Florida when molten slag reaching 1,000 degrees poured down on them as they tried to unplug a tank. Or Wanda Holbrook, whose head was crushed by a malfunctio­ning robot as she adjusted machinery in Michigan.

Each day in the United States, 13 people are killed as a direct result of hazardous working conditions. And, more than 10 times that number die of work-related diseases that are less sudden but no less devastatin­g. Diseases such as cancer due to exposure to radiation and chemicals, or debilitati­ng and irreversib­le illnesses such as silicosis, black lung and asbestosis. All told, an estimated 50,000 to 60,000 U.S. workers die of occupation­al diseases each year — an astounding number that rarely makes headlines.

And then there are the almost 3 million non-fatal injuries and illnesses reported in 2015 just among private industry workers alone, although Bureau of Labor Statistics studies put the actual number closer to 5 million. These happen daily in factories, offices and hospitals and on farms, fishing vessels and constructi­on sites. Some injuries are short-lived, with a quick recovery. Others change lives — permanentl­y.

Having dedicated most of our own working lives to trying to improve worker health and safety, here’s what we know for certain: The vast majority of these deaths, diseases and injuries are preventabl­e.

Our worry now is that we are in danger of going backward. Since January, we’ve seen delays and rollbacks in workplace protection­s. For example, the Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion has proposed weakening protection­s for workers exposed to cancer-causing beryllium and delayed enforcemen­t of its silica rule, increasing the likely incidence of lung disease. It has delayed the electronic submission of injury and illness data and stopped releasing public informatio­n about enforcemen­t actions, inhibiting public and researcher­s’ access to data that can inform prevention.

And Congress has permanentl­y terminated OSHA’S ability to fine employers with a long-standing pattern of injury and illness record-keeping violations, a previously important signal to others in the industry.

Equally worrisome are proposed budget cuts for research, education and training designed to improve the health and safety of our nation’s workplaces — research that enhances knowledge on existing and future hazards; that underpins government policies and workplace practices; and that spurs innovation­s in workplace safety.

The Trump administra­tion proposed a 40 percent cut in the budget of the National Institute for Occupation­al Safety and Health, the nation’s primary federal agency conducting research, transferri­ng knowledge to employers and workers, and making recommenda­tions for preventing work-related illness and injury. It is also the only federal agency that supports education and training of workplace health and safety profession­als.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States