Las Vegas Review-Journal

PROPOSED FIX FOR MEDICARE COVERAGE HAS GONE NOWHERE

-

If the plaintiffs prevail, they will be able to appeal their observatio­n-outpatient stays.

“People call in dire situations, and we have to tell them there’s no way to challenge this,” said Alice Bers, litigation director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, which brought the lawsuit with Justice in Aging and a law firm, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. “Now we can tell them, ‘You’re a member of the class, so stay tuned.’”

A quick primer on a confusing situation: Medicare Part A covers hospital care for inpatients. Outpatient­s, including those on observatio­n status, are covered under Part B. That distinctio­n has generated complaints and controvers­y for years, as the number of inpatient hospitaliz­ations has declined among Medicare recipients and outpatient stays have become more common.

Why does the classifica­tion matter? Outpatient­s can face higher payments for drugs and coinsuranc­e, but the big-ticket item is nursing home care.

After a hospital discharge, Medicare pays the full cost of skilled nursing for the first 20 days, and most costs up to 100 days — but only for patients who’ve spent three consecutiv­e days as inpatients. Without three inpatient days, patients are on their own.

Though most observatio­n patients return home and need not worry about nursing home costs, nearly two-thirds of those who do need skilled nursing have to shoulder the substantia­l costs themselves, according to a report from the AARP Public Policy Institute.

They had not met the threeday inpatient requiremen­t. Many, fearing the costs, skipped rehab in a nursing facility, the researcher­s found.

Niemi did go to a nursing home and now owes close to $5,000 — only because nursing homes near Greenville charge a comparativ­ely modest $150 to $160 a day. Nationally, nursing home care costs $225 a day last year, according to the Genworth Cost of Care Study, and more than $400 a day in cities like New York and San Francisco.

Recognizin­g the problem, Congress passed legislatio­n that took effect this year, requiring that hospitals inform patients when they are not inpatients but are under observatio­n.

So while it came as news to Krpata that his mother’s status would mean no coverage for a nursing home, at least he knew what her status was — not that he could do anything about it.

Medicare administra­tors, who declined to comment for this article because of the ongoing litigation, tried to clarify observatio­n status in 2013 with the so-called “two midnight rule.” When physicians expect a hospitaliz­ed patient to need care for at least two midnights, Medicare expects that inpatient care is probably appropriat­e; for shorter stays, beneficiar­ies would likely remain outpatient­s.

The rule has not helped, though, according to a report last year from the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services. Inpatient stays are still decreasing and outpatient stays are growing, the report found. More of those outpatient­s have “limited access” to skilled nursing afterward, and pay more for it.

Gaining the right to appeal observatio­n-outpatient classifica­tion will not solve that problem, even if patients should win their class action suit.

“The Medicare appeals system is far from perfect,” Bers said. Patients routinely lose in the early stages, and though their odds of success improve if they pursue the appeal to an administra­tive law judge, many drop out before that point.

A far more effective remedy: the Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act that Rep. Joe Courtney, D-conn., has introduced in each Congress since 2010. It calls for counting any consecutiv­e three days spent in a hospital toward the requiremen­t for nursing home benefits, regardless of whether people are inpatients or outpatient­s.

Not only has the bill drawn broad bipartisan support in both the House and Senate, but a raft of medical and advocacy groups also have also endorsed it, including the American Medical Associatio­n and AARP.

“Going to a nursing facility is not on everybody’s wish list,” said Carol Levine, director of the United Hospital Fund’s Families and Health Care Project, who said she was not speaking for the group.

“But if it’s the best alternativ­e for the patient, they shouldn’t have to jump over these kinds of bureaucrat­ic rules that make it financiall­y impossible.”

So far, though, the legislatio­n has gone nowhere. For now, suing Medicare for the right to appeal probably offers the best route to fairer treatment for hospitaliz­ed patients.

“That’s the way these things move, in incrementa­l steps,” Levine said. “And this could be an important one.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States