Reducing fire risk
GOP plan a step in the right direction
The numbers associated with the wildfires that ravaged Northern California last month are staggering. The fires burned across a 245,000-acre area — or nearly 400 square miles — and damaged or destroyed more than 14,000 homes, 700 commercial properties and 3,200 vehicles. The death toll is now up to 42.
While the financial losses are still being tabulated — with some estimates as high as $4.6 billion — lawmakers are debating ways to reduce the risk of similar fires in the future. One of the ideas being considered is a GOP bill that would wisely target current environmental rules and speed up approval for logging and other actions in national forests.
As USA Today notes, Republicans and members of the timber industry have long protested environmental rules that make it difficult to cut down trees to reduce fire risk. Plans to harvest trees on federal lands can take years to win approval. The GOP bill, which is set to be approved, would loosen environmental rules that block forest-thinning efforts on federal property.
“Now more than ever, there is a needed urgency to protect our nation’s federal forests from the kind of devastation that California experienced,” House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-wis., said last week. “(The bill) will help us stop forest fires before they occur.”
The U.S. Forest Service and other federal agencies have spent a record $2.9 billion this year battling fires that have burned nearly 9 million acres in California, Oregon, Montana and elsewhere. According to The Associated Press, the GOP bill is also designed to fix a “fire borrowing” problem that officials rely on to transfer funds from fire prevention programs to attack increasingly devastating wildfires.
The House bill’s sponsor, Rep. Bruce Westerman, R-ark., argues that the fires illustrate “how years of unmanaged federal forests have wreaked havoc on our environment, polluting our air and water and destroying thousands of acres of wildlife habitat.”
He and other Republicans tout proactive management of forests — including prescribed burns, salvage logging of dead trees and other projects to chop down small trees and underbrush — that would not only reduce the risk of wildfires but also reduce their severity.
“We must ask ourselves: What kind of future are we leaving for the next generation when we have failed to conserve federal forests that overwhelm the sky with thick smoke and ash when they burn?” says Sen. John Barrasso, R-wyo., chief sponsor of the Senate GOP bill.
As of last week, six large fires were still burning in the West. Democrats and environmental groups complain that Republicans are disregarding environmental laws, wildlife and the environment. Mother Nature is already doing a great job of that, however. What’s needed is a reasonable solution, which the GOP has proposed.
The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-journal. All other opinions expressed on the Opinion and Commentary pages are those of the individual artist or author indicated.
The Review-journal welcomes letters to the editor. Letters should not exceed 275 words and must include the writer’s name, mailing address and phone number. Submissions may be edited and become the property of the Review-journal.
Email letters@reviewjournal.com Mail Letters to the Editor
P.O. Box 70
Las Vegas, NV 89125
Fax 702-383-4676 argument to claim, as many do, that reporting these behaviors would harm their careers. We all make moral choices. We all should accept responsibility for both our actions and failures to act.
This significant problem in our culture requires that we overcome our reluctance to challenge those in power who abuse their positions. Careerists who tolerate these indignities should be recognized for the moral cowards they are.