Las Vegas Review-Journal

Senate approves tax reform legislatio­n

Last-minute tweaks produce 51-49 vote

- By Gary Martin Review-journal Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — Republican­s tweaked a $1.4 trillion tax-cut package to win over holdout GOP senators Friday and passed the first sweeping reform of the nation’s tax code in 30 years.

The Senate voted 51-49 to pass the tax-cut package that puts the Republican-led Congress a step closer to giving President Donald Trump his first legislativ­e victory.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch Mcconnell, R-KY., called the legislatio­n a “once in a lifetime” opportunit­y to cut taxes for corporatio­ns, businesses and individual­s.

But Sen. Ron Wyden, D-ore., the ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said the legislatio­n “betrays the middle-class” for faceless corporatio­ns.

“This vote will not be forgotten,” Wyden said.

The bill passed after an evening of parliament­ary manuevers and heated rhetoric as Republican­s muscled the legislatio­n through the process over objections from Democrats who chafed at the GOP tactics.

Sens. Dean Heller, R-nev., and Catherine Cortez Masto, D-nev., sided with their respective parties during those maneuvers.

“The U.S. Senate today passed sweeping legislatio­n that will give hardworkin­g Nevadans and Americans throughout the country the break that they deserve,” Heller said.

Republican­s touted their bill as one that would put money into

TAX BILL

the pockets of individual­s in every tax bracket and give corporatio­ns huge breaks to boost the economy and create jobs.

But the bill also would add $1 trillion in debt over a decade by eliminatin­g revenue-generating taxes, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. The analysis also undercut GOP projection­s on economic growth, saying the bill would provide only a 0.8 percent boost to the economy.

Republican deficit hawks wanted a “trigger” mechanism to automatica­lly implement tax hikes if growth projection­s and generated revenues did not materializ­e. When GOP leaders declined to put the trigger in the bill, Sen. Bob Corker, R-tenn., announced his opposition.

“I’m disappoint­ed. I wanted to get to yes,” Corker said. “But at the end of the day, I am not able to cast aside my fiscal concerns and vote for legislatio­n I believe, based on informatio­n I currently have, could deepen the debt burden on future generation­s.”

But other hawks like Sens. James Lankford, R-okla., Steve Daines, R-mont., and Jeff Flake, R-ariz., announced they would support the bill without the trigger.

Flake said he would vote in favor of the package after receiving reassuranc­es it is “fiscally responsibl­e and promotes economic growth.”

Collins announces support

Another holdout, Sen. Susan Collins, R-maine, announced her support after a promise by Mcconnell to include a federal deduction of up to $10,000 for state and local taxes paid by individual­s.

Collins said Mcconnell also assured her that the bill would not force a $25 billion cut to Medicare in the first year.

AARP, the lobby for retirees, cited a Congressio­nal Budget Office analysis that found the bill would provide $136 billion in tax cuts in 2018 and force $25 billion in cuts to Medicare that year under current budget rules.

An AARP analysis also found that those 65 and older would receive an initial tax cut but would face higher taxes in 2027, when individual tax cuts in the Senate bill would sunset.

Corporate tax rates would be Nevada’s two senators, Dean Heller, a Republican, and Catherine Cortez Masto, a Democrat, sided with their respective parties.

permanentl­y reduced from 35 percent to 20 percent under the bill. President Donald Trump and GOP leaders said those cuts would spur a $4 trillion surge in corporate investment in the United States that would create millions of jobs.

Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-ore., however, called it “Wall Street welfare.”

Democrats were united against the bill. They said the package offered a “bag of goodies” to the wealthiest families, large businesses and corporatio­ns, but just peanuts for middle-class families.

The Joint Committee on Taxation said that, because of the sunset provision on individual tax cuts, most families earning $75,000 a year or less would see higher taxes in 2027.

“This is not middle-class tax relief,” said Sen. Bill Nelson, D-fla.

Small-business opposition

The Main Street Alliance, a national group that represents small businesses, including 10 from Nevada, opposed the bill because it does not improve communitie­s through affordable health care, well-funded schools and maintained roads.

Small-business owners, like Dee Holden in Las Vegas and retired broker Gil Vogel of Liberty Realty in Pahrump, signed a letter sent to the House and Senate that said the taxcut plans would “ultimately slash programs that are vital for small business owners like me.”

But the National Federation of Independen­t Business, an associatio­n representi­ng small businesses, reversed its initial opposition to the Senate bill after GOP lawmakers improved cuts for mom-and-pop shops.

For individual­s, the bill would double the standard deduction on federal forms to $12,000 and $24,000 for couples.

Heller was instrument­al in increasing the child tax credit, which he said would help Nevada families living “paycheck to paycheck.”

The Senate bill also eliminates the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act, which requires people to purchase health care plans or face an IRS penalty.

A CBO analysis of the provision, however, said the bill would increase premiums purchased on public exchanges by 10 percent and leave 13 million more Americans without insurance by 2027.

Cortez Masto said the cost of the “GOP tax scam” would be “too high for the 13 million Americans” who will become uninsured if they lose lifesaving health coverage.

Repeal of the ACA individual mandate is not included in a version of the bill passed by the House on Nov. 16.

That bill, which passed along party lines, would eliminate federal deductions for medical expenses and student loan interest and cap the mortgage interest deduction at $500,000, down from $1 million currently.

Difference­s in the two bills would be ironed out in a House-senate conference committee.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States