Las Vegas Review-Journal

Top EU court rules against Uber

Company must be regulated like transport service

- By Angela Charlton and Aritz Parra The Associated Press

BARCELONA, Spain — Uber suffered a new blow Wednesday as the European Union’s top court ruled that it should be regulated as a transport company instead of a technology service, a decision that crimps its activities around Europe and could weigh on other app-based companies, too.

Taxi drivers honked horns to celebrate the ruling, which punctures Uber’s image as the pioneer of a new gig economy that’s setting its own rules while government­s clamber to keep up.

Uber — which is wrapping up a particular­ly punishing year — sought to downplay the decision, which might only affect the company’s operations in four countries. Uber said it will try to keep expanding in Europe anyway.

The decision by the Luxembourg-based European Court of Justice in theory applies to ride-hailing services around the 28-nation EU. But the ruling leaves it to national government­s to decide how and whether to change the way they regulate Uber and similar services.

Uber has gained a strong foothold and customer base in most European countries, adapting its multiple services to bend to local rules when faced with legal challenges. Its hallmark low-cost service — hooking up unlicensed freelance drivers with riders via an app — is already banned in many European cities, and instead Uber’s services are much like taxis, just more flexible and sometimes cheaper.

Other internet-based businesses fear the ruling could suppress innovation and usher in other restrictio­ns, as European authoritie­s look for ways to regulate companies that operate online and outside traditiona­l sectors and don’t fit in with existing laws.

The decision stems from a complaint by a Barcelona taxi drivers associatio­n, which wanted to prevent Uber from setting up in the Spanish city. The taxi drivers said Uber drivers should have authorizat­ions and licenses, and accused the company of engaging in unfair competitio­n.

Arguing its case, San Francisco-based Uber said it should be regulated as an informatio­n services provider, because it is based on an app that connects drivers to riders.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States