Las Vegas Review-Journal

‘Rotten’ gets to bottom of food chain

- By Lorraine Ali Los Angeles Times

The truth is hard to swallow. That’s the tagline for “Rotten,” Netflix’s new original documentar­y series about the shady business behind the food we eat.

The six-part series considers the origin of our groceries with a skepticism usually reserved for truecrime production­s and detective dramas. Episodes explore a shadowy garlic business routed through Chinese prisons, the mystery behind America’s sudden spike in food allergies and a global scandal called Honeygate.

The common thread throughout episodes such as “Cod Is Dead,” “Lawyers, Guns & Honey” and “Garlic Breath” is the exploratio­n of how corporate greed and corruption have quite literally changed the nature and origins of the food that America consumes.

And as with any wellresear­ched and reasonably argued documentar­y about eating in the 21st century, the idea is to educate the consumer about healthier and more responsibl­e cuisine choices. And, of course, trust no one — as if that trip to the market weren’t already fraught with carb counting, organic versus natural, and decoding countless cover names for corn syrup.

“Rotten” will have viewers deconstruc­ting the human misery that went into making that jar of garlic paste in their pantry or examining what they really stirred into their tea this morning because honey isn’t what it used to be.

The series’ hourlong episodes are a combinatio­n of original reporting, profession­ally shot footage and compelling personal narratives from here and abroad. Corporatio­ns, small farms, doctors, lawyers, law enforcemen­t personnel and consumers are all interviewe­d, but this series is not quite as academic, or intent on terrifying its audience, as some of its peers.

Zero Point Zero — the production company behind Anthony Bourdain’s “No Reservatio­ns” and “Parts Unknown” — are the creators here. They know how to entertain as they educate, infusing the show with enough internatio­nal intrigue, crime and nefarious twists to make legumes and cod fish seem sexy. “Rotten” even offers up hard-boiled, insider vernacular in its exploratio­n of “agro business monocultur­e,” “food fraud” and, worst of all, “honey heists.”

Each episode opens like a food paranoid’s version of “The X-files”: stark contrasts, ominous music and foreboding graphics of livestock, produce and foreign currency.

But the dramatic trimmings are there to dress up “Rotten’s” main mission: exposing the effects of greedy corporate practices on small businesses, farms and unsuspecti­ng consumers, and the series does a solid job in achieving that goal.

The setup here can be repetitive and over-explanator­y at times. For example, in “The Problem With Peanuts” the filmmakers feature too many firsthand accounts of kids and adults with deadly food allergies. It surely humanizes the problem, but it also takes up the majority of the episode, leaving little time to plumb the depths of what we don’t know — why a significan­t percentage of young people are suddenly rejecting Western diet staples such as eggs, fish and wheat.

But “Rotten” does answer other questions, such as the mystery behind the decline of bees in the

U.S. and globally since the mid2000s. You’ll have to watch for the full answer, but it has much to do with small American beekeepers competing with imported Chinese honey and the lengths to which they and their bees have been pushed to stay alive and in business.

The documentar­y sympathize­s both with the uninformed shopper and the “food-enlightene­d consumer,” the latter being those who make it a point to research the origins of the food they eat.

As “Rotten” highlights, however, we’re all woefully clueless in the face of corporate subterfuge and government loopholes. But knowledge is power … and, perhaps, a locally sourced jar of honey.

 ??  ?? Netflix Netflix’s new documentar­y series “Rotten” examines the food industry with a skepticism usually reserved for true-crime shows.
Netflix Netflix’s new documentar­y series “Rotten” examines the food industry with a skepticism usually reserved for true-crime shows.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States