Las Vegas Review-Journal

Frederick Douglass, a champion of American individual­ism

- George Will

It was an assertion of hard-won personal sovereignt­y: Frederick Douglass, born on a Maryland plantation 200 years ago this month, never knew on what February day because history-deprivatio­n was inflicted to confirm slaves as non-persons. So, later in life, Douglass picked the 14th, the middle of the month, as his birthday. This February, remember him, the first African-american to attain historic stature.

In an inspired choice to write a short biography of this fierce defender of individual­ism, Washington’s libertaria­n Cato Institute commission­ed the Goldwater Institute’s Timothy Sandefur, who says that Douglass was, in a sense, born when he was 16. After six months of being whipped once a week with sticks and rawhide thongs — arbitrary punishment was used to stunt a slave’s dangerous sense of personhood — Douglass fought his tormentor. Sent to Baltimore, where he was put to work building ships — some of them slave transports — he soon fled north to freedom, and to fame as an anti-slavery orator and author. His 1845 “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” is, as Sandefur says, a classic of American autobiogra­phy.

Abolitioni­sts such as William Lloyd Garrison said there should be “no union with slaveholde­rs,” preferring disunion to associatio­n with slave states. They said what the Supreme Court would say in its execrable 1857 Dred Scott decision — that the Constituti­on was a pro-slavery document. Douglass, however, knew that Abraham Lincoln knew better.

“Here comes my friend Douglass,” exclaimed Lincoln at the March 4, 1865, reception following his second inaugurati­on. After the assassinat­ion 42 days later, Lincoln’s widow gave Douglass her husband’s walking stick. After Appomattox, Douglass, who had attended the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention on behalf of women’s suffrage, said: “Slavery is not abolished until the black man has the ballot.” If so, slavery ended not with the 13th Amendment of 1865 but with the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Douglass opposed radical Republican­s’ proposals to confiscate plantation­s and distribute the land to former slaves. Sandefur surmises that “Douglass was too well versed in the history and theory of freedom not to know” the importance of property rights. Douglass, says Sandefur, was not a conservati­ve but a legatee of “the classical liberalism of the American founding.” His individual­ism was based on the virtue of self-reliance. “He was not,” Sandefur says, “likely to be attracted to any doctrine that subordinat­ed individual rights — whether free speech or property rights — to the interests of the collective.”

Although Douglass entered the post-civil War era asking only that blacks at last be left to fend for themselves, he knew that “it is not fair play to start the Negro out in life, from nothing and with nothing.” A 20th-century Southerner agreed. In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson said: “You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him to the starting line of a race and then say, ‘you are free to compete with all the others,’ and still justly believe that you have been completely fair.” As Martin Luther King Jr. knew: In 1965, he met Alabama sharecropp­ers who, having been paid all their lives in plantation scrip, had never seen U.S. currency. Peonage had followed slavery in sharecropp­er society.

By the time of Douglass’ 1895 death, the nation was saturated with sinister sentimenta­lity about the nobility of the South’s Lost Cause: The war had really been about constituti­onal niceties — “states’ rights” — not slavery. This, Sandefur says, was ludicrous: Before the war, Southerner­s “had sought more federal power, not less, in the form of nationwide enforcemen­t of the Fugitive Slave Act and federal subsidies for slavery’s expansion.”

Neverthele­ss, in the South, monuments to Confederat­e soldiers were erected and Confederat­e symbols were added to states’ flags. In the North, the University of Chicago’s Charles Edward Merriam, a leading progressiv­e, wrote in a widely used textbook that “from the standpoint of modern political science, the slaveholde­rs were right” about some people not being entitled to freedom. As an academic, Woodrow Wilson paid “loving tribute to the virtues of the leaders of the secession, to the purity of their purposes.” As president, he relished making “The Birth of a Nation,” a celebratio­n of the Ku Klux Klan, the first movie shown in the White House.

Douglass died 30 years before 25,000 hooded Klansmen marched down Pennsylvan­ia Avenue. That same year, Thurgood Marshall graduated from Baltimore’s Frederick Douglass High School, en route to winning Brown v. Board of Education. Douglass, not Wilson, won the American future.

 ?? STEVEN SENNE / AP FILE (2013) ?? Then-massachuse­tts Gov. Deval Patrick, right, stands next to a likeness of abolitioni­st leader Frederick Douglass while participat­ing in a community reading of the Emancipati­on Proclamati­on on July 2, 2013.
STEVEN SENNE / AP FILE (2013) Then-massachuse­tts Gov. Deval Patrick, right, stands next to a likeness of abolitioni­st leader Frederick Douglass while participat­ing in a community reading of the Emancipati­on Proclamati­on on July 2, 2013.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States