Las Vegas Review-Journal

Returning to cheerful profession­alism

- MISS MANNERS

GENTLE READERS: This is probably not the year to celebrate Valentine’s Day at the office.

There never was a time that even innocent romance belonged in the workplace. If it ends badly, there will be suspicions of retaliatio­n. If it ends happily, there will be suspicions of favoritism.

But when a show of affection is condoned as ordinary office behavior, abuse becomes easy. Miss Manners was shocked to read of a prominent feminist who was talked about how she always hugs her colleagues.

What if some dude hates it when she does that?

It is not Miss Manners’ job to discipline outlaws. Dealing with sex crimes and misdemeano­rs is the responsibi­lity of the legal system.

Etiquette is intended to regulate behavior in the communal interest, but it is a voluntary system, which does not deter those who are determined to behave badly and feel no shame. It lacks weapons other than social disapprova­l and exclusion — and these have been in short supply.

But as we have now seen, social pressure is essential in motivating those who do have power to enforce obedience. Unfortunat­ely, it does not always operate for the good. That it long discourage­d victims of harassment from seeking redress has now been thoroughly exposed.

That has been publicly acknowledg­ed. But well-meaning people continue to foster a dangerous environmen­t. That includes the adorable-sounding fantasies about colleagues all being friends; jobs providing opportunit­ies for leisure; and unsolicite­d hugs being welcome and beneficial to all.

There was an excellent reason for opposing the old rules: All the respect and leeway they provided was accorded only to the male hierarchy. Whatever socializin­g there was on office time, such as lunches or golfing breaks, was strictly for them.

But when a need to modernize is recognized, it never seems to be done by applying the higher standard to all. And revisions in office behavior occurred at a time when the sweet idea was wafting around that personal friends are happier and more productive than mere colleagues.

Of course, that means that you don’t get to choose your personal friends; the boss chooses them for you. They may also be your rivals.

So it does not seem to be a great sacrifice to expect cheerful but profession­al manners at work, so that those who are so moved can distribute their hugs on their own time.

Submit your etiquette questions to Miss Manners at dearmissma­nners@gmail. com.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States