Las Vegas Review-Journal

Laughlin property owners will get refunds

Money was collected for infrastruc­ture projects

- By Michael Scott Davidson Las Vegas Review-journal

Clark County will refund Laughlin property owners as much as $4.1 million in assessment fees starting next month.

Nearly 1,600 property owners are eligible to claim excess money collected to fund infrastruc­ture improvemen­ts in and around the town, according to the Laughlin Economic Developmen­t Corporatio­n.

County commission­ers voted Tuesday to repay owners of properties inside three Special Improvemen­t Districts. Whoever owned the property on Jan. 17 can request repayment from March 1 through April 30. Unclaimed money will be kept by the county.

Eligible property owners will be mailed claim forms starting March 1.

The refunds represent closure on transporta­tion and flood control projects that began in the mid-1990s, said Bob Bilbray, a property owner and Laughlin EDC strategic developmen­t adviser.

“I’m the only surviving member of any of these (Special Improvemen­t Districts),” Bilbray told commission­ers Tuesday. “I’m now dealing with the kids and the grandkids and the great-grandkids of those who contribute­d to making this day possible. What we’re talking about here is multi-generation­al obligation­s.”

The county paid upfront for the infrastruc­ture projects by issuing bonds. Property owners in Laughlin’s Special Improvemen­t Districts then paid the county the cost of the bonds and accrued interest over several years.

But while the county finished collecting the bulk of the money in 2015, in one case nearly $115,000 lingered in a Special Improvemen­t District fund that’s been dormant since 2005. That drew concern from Bilbray and some county commission­ers.

“It’s intolerabl­e for us to hang on to people’s money that they’ve paid in one of these Special Improvemen­t Districts for any longer than we must,” Commission­er Jim Gibson said.

County CFO Jessica Colvin said the long wait was due to county staff wanting to distribute refunds for all three Special Improvemen­t Districts at the same time. When the initiative formally began last March it took time to find the property owners and figure out how to pay back the money in the most equitable fashion. Property owners are entitled to any interest the money generated while they waited.

Despite those explanatio­ns, County Commission Chairman Steve Sisolak said what happened in Laughlin demands that the county be more efficient.

“It’s not just the dollar amount, which is significan­t. … It’s incumbent upon us to be as prompt as we can in determinin­g when that project is done, refunding the money and rebating the money to the people,” Sisolak said.

At Sisolak’s request, Colvin said she would gather specifics on how many more dormant Special Improvemen­t Districts owe refunds. She said that there are only “a handful more” and dispersing refunds would be faster in the future.

“I think we’re to the point now where we’re almost current and going forward there’s a process in place,” Colvin said.

Contact Michael Scott Davidson at sdavidson@reviewjour­nal.com or 702-477-3861. Follow @davidsonlv­rj on Twitter.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States