A license to earn a living?

Lawmakers should streamline regulations

The state of New Hampshire is taking steps to combat the mushrooming number of occupations that require professional licenses. The approach should serve as a model for other states — including Nevada — to tear down barriers that needlessly make it more difficult for millions of Americans to earn an honest living.

Back in the 1950s, according to a University of Minnesota study, roughly 5 percent of U.S. jobs required some form of occupational license — mostly covering professionals such as doctors, lawyers and pilots. Thanks to the vast expansion of the regulatory state, about 25 percent of all jobs are currently subject to state occupational licensing requirements, Politico reports. That includes more than 1,000 professions.

The Institute for Justice has spent decades documenting the capricious nature of these requirements. For example, a 2012 IJ study found that the typical EMT license costs $85 and requires 33 days of education and training. Yet cosmetologists must be licensed in all 50 states at an average cost of $142, and they must complete more than a year of education and training — including two exams.

Licensed commercial carpenters and cabinet makers in 29 states and the District of Columbia must shell out about $300 and spend roughly 450 days in school, IJ reports. Until last year, New Hampshire residents could legally work braiding hair only if they first spent 1,500 hours training and nearly $20,000 to become a licensed cosmetologist.

Proponents of such restrictions cite consumer health and safety concerns to justify the requirements — and few people would argue that medical doctors or airline pilots shouldn’t be subjected to licensing regulations. But for scores of occupations — cosmetologists, landscapers, interior decorators and many, many more — the laws are thinly veiled protection rackets designed to shield existing practitioners from competition.

“Far too many workers are spending their time earning a license when they should be earning a living,” says Lee Mcgrath, the IJ’S senior legislative counsel.

Now New Hampshire seeks to buck the trend. A bill pending in the Granite State legislature would create an “Occupational Regulation Review Commission” to evaluate both existing and proposed regulations. It would also examine one-fifth of the state’s occupational regulations each year to identify “any rules or laws that should be repealed or modified so they are the least restrictive,” IJ reports.

This an encouraging step forward. Not only do many of these laws unnecessarily limit employment opportunities for millions of Americans — particularly those of lesser means — but they also drive up costs for consumers by limiting new entrants into the marketplace.

New Hampshire has the right idea. Nevada lawmakers should take notice.

The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-journal. All other opinions expressed on the Opinion and Commentary pages are those of the individual artist or author indicated.

The Review-journal welcomes letters to the editor. Letters should not exceed 275 words and must include the writer’s name, mailing address and phone number. Submissions may be edited and become the property of the Review-journal.

Email letters@reviewjournal.com Mail Letters to the Editor

P.O. Box 70

Las Vegas, NV 89125

Fax 702-383-4676 matching their employees’ donations, the entire community came together to help.

It’s a miracle and a demonstration that there is good in this world.

I commend the Las Vegas Victims’ Fund committee for working tirelessly to get these resources distributed.

The money is incredibly important, and I will always be grateful for the more than 88,000 donors who chipped in to help. But what will really stay with me is the way the community came together after the chaos and horror we experienced. We saw the first responders and hospital personnel who worked around the clock; the concertgoers who carried strangers to safety; and the families who brought food and water to first responders and to victims’ shelters. That was us showing the world who we are.

We will continue to heal, and we will forever be #Vegasstrong.

The writer is chairman of the Clark County Commission. have poor impulse control. If they know there is a gun in the building, they will be curious. These guns must be loaded and at hand in case of emergencies. If a student finds one, the result could be tragic.

I heard a great idea on a radio show: Veterans and retired police should volunteer to patrol schools. They are already trained to use firearms, they would have their own weapons and ammunition and there would be a lot of them. These men and women made careers serving their country. Now they would proudly serve their communities.

From their service records, schools could see who had proficiency with guns and no criminal or mental health issues. Those acceptable would be required to qualify at a firing range to ensure they still have what it takes.

If we must arm people inside schools, let them be people with experience and expertise. Keep weapons away from children.

Let teachers do their jobs — which is to teach, not to shoot.