Las Vegas Review-Journal

A horrific truth: We are governed by Fox News

- Charles Blow

During the early days of the Obama administra­tion, I did a few appearance­s on “Fox & Friends.” The conversati­ons were predictabl­y tilted and exploitive. The hosts had a knack for asking the idiotic with chipper earnestnes­s, spewing venom through simpering smiles.

I knew I was swimming in a shallow intellectu­al pool, and yet I told myself that I was doing yeoman’s work, doing my small part to try and correct misinforma­tion and to reach those lost in Fox’s fog.

But I soon discovered that the show — indeed, the network — was beyond redemption.

I was being used to help give the show the appearance of fairness, impartiali­ty and legitimacy, when it was anything but.

Appearing on Fox, I became part of the disinforma­tion machine rather than hobbling it. So, I cut ties, stopped responding to their requests and stopped the appearance­s.

I never saw the show as anything more than a carnival, a propaganda tool for conservati­ves. I would never have thought the show’s hosts would emerge as the most influentia­l in U.S. media, as the website Mediaite dubbed them.

This show, with its kindergart­en-level intellectu­al capacity, moved from parroting conservati­ve policies to constructi­ng presidenti­al priorities. “Fox & Friends” has essentiall­y become Donald Trump’s daily briefing.

Countless media outlets have written and talked about the connection between Trump and the show.

As The Guardian put it, “The show manages to serve as a court sycophant, whispering in the ear of the king, criticizin­g his perceived enemies and fluffing his feathers.”

Politico Magazine concurred, saying the show “feels intentiona­lly designed for Trump himself — a three-hour, high-definition ego fix.”

And the impact the show is having on Trump is undeniable. Dan Snow, a master’s student at the University of Chicago, analyzed the president’s tweets and found that they are highly concentrat­ed in the hours when the show is on.

As Politico wrote, Trump is “live-tweeting” Fox’s coverage. Vox noted that at times he seems to be tweeting precisely what he sees on the show, sometimes using their exact language.

Indeed, a February analysis by The Washington Post found that of all the things Trump has tweeted about since his inaugurati­on, “Fox & Friends” ranked third, behind only former President Barack Obama and tax cuts.

In fact, Trump had tweeted about the show roughly twice as often as about the stock market and roughly three times more often than about the border wall.

Trump’s Fox fixation isn’t benign or inconseque­ntial — because, like him, the network has an aversion to the truth.

According to Punditfact, a project of the Tampa Bay Times and the Poynter Institute that checks the accuracy of claims made by pundits, of the statements on Fox that have been factchecke­d, only 10 percent were rated true, while a full 60 percent were rated either mostly false, false or “pants on fire,” the worst possible rating.

The site did not do a separate analysis confined to “Fox & Friends,” but it has done three fact checks each on two of the show’s co-hosts: Brian Kilmeade and Steve Doocy.

In both cases, two statements were rated false and one rated “pants on fire.”

But these fact checks don’t even paint the full picture of how problemati­c this show is. Kilmeade once said on the show that “the Swedes have pure genes because they marry other Swedes” and of Finland he said, “Fins marry other Fins so they have a pure society,” which was apparently better than America because, “We keep marrying other species and other ethnics.”

Doocy once attacked Spongebob for pushing a “global warming agenda.” He was accused in a lawsuit by former co-host Gretchen Carlson of engaging in a “pattern and practice of severe and pervasive sexual harassment,” in part by “refusing to accept and treat her as an intelligen­t and insightful female journalist rather than a blond female prop.”

This would all be silly trifle if in January the show didn’t mark its 195th month as the No. 1 morning cable news program and if the president of the United States wasn’t taking cues from it.

In a way, the United States is being governed by the dimmest of wits on the most unscrupulo­us of networks. The very thought of it is horror-inducing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States