Las Vegas Review-Journal

At-home water testing kits check for contaminan­ts

- By Debbie Carlson Tribune News Service

With news events like the lead-contaminat­ed drinking water in Flint, Michigan, natural disasters such as hurricanes temporaril­y harming water supplies and general reports of water-quality issues, consumers may be more interested in testing the water in their homes.

A recent survey by water-filtration company Bluewater showed 56 percent of Americans worry their drinking water contains toxins, with one-third concerned about lead and toxic metals.

Marc Edwards, professor of civil engineerin­g at Virginia Tech and one of the scientists who uncovered the lead-poisoned water in Flint, said consumers’ concerns are legitimate.

“Even if 95 percent of the waters outtherear­esafetodri­nkandare meeting federal law, the fact that 5, 10 percent are not is enough to justify fear,” Edwards said.

Tom Round, vice president of business developmen­t at Silver Lake Research Corp., which produces the Watersafe Test Kits (starting at $19.95 through www.watersafet­estkits.com) and private-labels water-testing kits, said his company had seen steady interest for the kits, but demand has increased recently.

“We really got to the inflection point after the Flint crisis,” Round said.

Whileexper­tssaytheu.s.has some of the best water supplies in the world, aging municipal infrastruc­ture and other potential environmen­tal issues mean people shouldn’t take their water safety for granted, said Birnur K. Aral, the health, beauty and environmen­tal sciences director at the Good Housekeepi­ng Institute.

Although municipali­ties test water at the source, it can be contaminat­ed along the way after it’s sent out, Round said. For homes built before 1990, the plumbing may have lead connectors from municipal water mains, which is where problems arise for homeowners.

In Southern Nevada, the region’s comparativ­ely new water system is comprised of copper rather than lead pipes. Copper can leach into drinking water through plumbing, but the valley’s water agencies take steps to protect pipes so they don’t corrode.

Other contaminan­ts, such as arsenic and uranium, are naturally occurring and can leach into a water system from the surroundin­g soil.

Do the kits detect water quality issues? Overall, yes.

The Good Housekeepi­ng Institute worked with the Water Quality Lab at the University of Nebraska to measure the accuracy of commonly available water kits. Aral said the kit that came out tops in their tests was the Purtest Home Water Analysis Kit ($36.60, www.grainger.com), which accurately detected the contaminan­tsitsaidit­wouldtest.

Other review websites like The Spruce cite kits from Watersafe,

First Alert ($15.95, www.firstalert­store.com) and Baldwin Meadows ($22.99, www.baldwin-meadows. com) as easy-to-use, accurate athome water test kits.

Before buying a kit, Aral said, homeowners in major cities should ask their water department­s for the annual consumer confidence reports. These give a general overview of water quality and the regulated contaminan­ts the municipali­ty detected in the treated water, along with the level of contaminat­ion for the preceding calendar year. Some city water department­s offer free or subsidized kits, Edwards said.

The majority of the at-home test kits use quick-read chemical strips to detect major hazards, including lead, some chemicals, some pesticides and bacteria. Most of these give indication­s on a pass/fail scale, rather than explaining how much of a certain substance may be in the water, Aral said.

“If you’re just really worried about leadandyou­justwantto­getaquick read without waiting to send something to a lab, this is a good start,” she said.

Consumers can also buy mail-in test kits, such as those from 120Waterau­dit ($54, www.120waterda­udit. com), which has a basic lead testing kit, or Drinking Water Specialist­s ($129 www.drinkingwa­terspecial­ists. com), which will test for 174 contaminan­ts. These kits analyze water samples in their labs and send users the results.

Both Edwards and Aral say if the tests come back positive, it’s a sign the water contains that particular substance. From there, consumers can go to the Environmen­tal Protection Agency’s website to find accredited labs for greater water testing if they choose, Aral said.

When consumers use these kits, they should consider them snapshots in time, because what’s in the water can change. The EPA recommends that people test municipal water annually.

Round and Aral said people who have well water should test more often, because it is at higher risk for bacteria contaminat­ion.

 ??  ??
 ?? 120Wnterau­dit ?? Wnter testing eits shor N snnpshot of rhnt’s in your rnter rhen the test is conducted.
120Wnterau­dit Wnter testing eits shor N snnpshot of rhnt’s in your rnter rhen the test is conducted.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States