Las Vegas Review-Journal

Trump sows confusion on trade

It’s not always clear who is calling the shots for the U.S., or what our policies are

- By Keith Bradsher New York Times News Service

SHANGHAI — As the United States challenges Europe, China, Canada, Mexico and much of the rest of the world over trade, deep factionali­sm within the Trump administra­tion has flummoxed both U.S. allies and rivals. The White House strikes a conciliato­ry tone one day and a militant one the next, often depending on which Trump advisers are in favor.

Increasing­ly, leaders in other countries are asking who is calling the shots: the globalists, the nationalis­ts, the trade hawks or someone else?

To a degree, the mixed messages reflect the negotiatin­g tactics of a president who likes to keep the other side off balance. Even while his team was in Beijing this weekend, President Donald Trump, in a Twitter post, suggested a confrontat­ional approach, calling out China over the trade imbalance. The two sides made little progress in discussion­s.

The inconsiste­ncy has spurred internatio­nal leaders to court Trump officials who they think will offer a sympatheti­c ear, rather than the White House as a whole — a divide-and-conquer approach that could make trade deals harder to strike. It has also eroded the belief among many leaders that the Trump administra­tion will keep its word.

“We have to believe that at some point their common sense will prevail,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada said in a tweet, referring to the American public, after the Trump administra­tion’s latest move on tariffs. “But we see no sign of that in this action today by the U.S. administra­tion.”

Even the Chinese government, which typically couches its most aggressive statements in oblique diplomatic terms, is increasing­ly talking about the administra­tion with the rhetorical equivalent

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States