Las Vegas Review-Journal

Union coercion

Workers can’t be forced to pay dues

- Marnie Wagner Las Vegas Robert Bencivenga Henderson

The Supreme Court ended its current term on Wednesday by standing up for free speech and individual liberty in the face of coercion. In a 5-4 ruling, the justices held that states can’t force government workers who choose not to join a labor organizati­on to pay union dues.

Shortly after the decision was released, Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, paving the way for President Donald Trump to make his second appointmen­t to the court. Let’s hope his short list is confined to accomplish­ed jurists inclined to embrace the constituti­onal principles of the Founders.

The labor ruling was widely expected and overturns a 1977 decision which acknowledg­ed that forcing nonmembers to pay for union political activity violated the Constituti­on but signed off on mandatory employee contributi­ons — so-called “agency fees” — to pay for collective bargaining. The finding was supposed to facilitate “labor peace” and to address “free riders,” the derogatory term for workers who decline to join a labor group yet are covered by union-negotiated contracts.

But Mark Janus, an Illinois state employee, sued to stop the practice, arguing the precedent created a distinctio­n without a difference. Public-sector collective bargaining, he asserted, is inherently political, touching on policy issues such as the size of government and its fiscal trajectory.

Mr. Janus maintained that he did not support the policies espoused by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, so he should not be required to finance any of its activities, even collective bargaining.

A majority of the court agreed — and made it clear that workers have a First Amendment right to withhold contributi­ons to organizati­ons with which they disagree.

“Neither an agency fee nor any other payment to the union may be deducted from a nonmember’s wages,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote, “nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmativ­ely consents to pay.”

The decision is long overdue and a victory for freedom. The government has no business compelling workers, in any capacity, to help bankroll groups they don’t support. To argue otherwise is to undermine the concepts of free speech and free associatio­n. The solution to “free riders” is to rescind the union monopoly on bargaining power.

Union leaders and their allies have long feared Wednesday’s ruling. For decades, they have been free to raise millions of dollars on the backs of nonmembers to help finance a massive war chest used to agitate for various progressiv­e political endeavors or to support Democratic candidates. The Janus decision threatens to slow the cash flow.

“To compel a man to furnish contributi­ons of money for the propagatio­n of opinions which he disbelieve­s and abhors,” wrote Thomas Jefferson, “is sinful and tyrannical.” Jefferson was addressing religious freedom when he wrote that, but it’s just as applicable to state-mandated contributi­ons to specific causes. If compulsion is all that can sustain Big Labor’s political machine, it deserves its fate.

The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-journal. All other opinions expressed on the Opinion and Commentary pages are those of the individual artist or author indicated.

The Review-journal welcomes letters to the editor. Letters should not exceed 275 words and must include the writer’s name, mailing address and phone number. Submission­s may be edited and become the property of the Review-journal.

Email letters@reviewjour­nal.com Mail Letters to the Editor

P.O. Box 70

Las Vegas, NV 89125

Fax 702-383-4676 House and Senate cannot pass any legislatio­n to strengthen our borders and return all these people to theircount­ries.iameven more disgusted that the Democrats who have the loudest voices about our current situation will do nothing to pass legislatio­n to help fix it.

I have determined that I will vote for no politician who refuses to come out with a plan to get this situation under control and to protect “Dreamers” but also put controls on “chain migration.” We must come up with a plan that is based on people who we need in this country, especially educated ones who can fill jobs that require skills.

I have lived in Las Vegas more than 60 years and have seen what the illegal population has done to our school district, health care system, law enforcemen­t, etc. I want my elected politician­s to stand for programs that benefit U.S. citizens first. Stand up for your principles and refuse to give credibilit­y to all those who gather in our streets but do nothing to help fix the immigratio­n problems. the actions of some people publicly shaming Trump administra­tion officials while never commenting on the president’s constant public shaming of people via Twitter? From dying war heroes to late night show hosts to political opponents, the president gives no quarter. Actions of both parties are bad for the country, but for some reason, you give the president a pass.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States