Las Vegas Review-Journal

The Democrats and ICE

Open-border crowd gains traction on left

- Ed Dornlas Las Vegas Nadio Romeo Las Vegas

There’s a new rallying cry sweeping the Democrat Party: Abolish ICE. But if Democrats aren’t careful, that rallying cry might abolish their chances of retaking control of Congress this fall.

As recently as three weeks ago, advocating the eliminatio­n of the U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t would have been unthinkabl­e for any well-known Democrat. That changed after self-described socialist Alexandria Ocasio-cortez defeated New York incumbent Rep. Joe Crowley last month in a Democrat primary. Ms. Ocasio-cortez ran to the left of Bernie Sanders and advocated doing away with the immigratio­n agency. Democrats eyeing a 2020 presidenti­al run took notice. On June 28 Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y. , said she wanted to “get rid of ” ICE and “start over, re-imagine it, and build something that actually works.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-mass., took a break from plagiarizi­ng recipes for a Pow Wow Chow cookbook to lend her support. “We need to rebuild our immigratio­n system from top to bottom, starting by replacing ICE with something that reflects our morality,” she said at an immigratio­n rally last Saturday. The previous weekend she was in Reno speaking at the Nevada state Democratic Party Convention.

On the bright side, perhaps it’s a hopeful sign that progressiv­es have finally found a government agency they want to get rid of. The problem is that the agency is responsibl­e for a core government function: enforcing the nation’s immigratio­n laws. For instance, a 2017 ICE raid in Long Island resulted in the arrest of 32 sex offenders, starting the deportatio­n process.

That’s much different than the forced separation of mothers and children, which Democrats have used as a bludgeon against Donald Trump for the past month. In fact, ICE has nothing to do with family separation. U.S. Customs and Border Protection is responsibl­e for enforcing immigratio­n laws at the border and other ports of entry. ICE is responsibl­e for internal enforcemen­t, such as deporting illegal immigrants convicted of crimes.

At this point, it’s clear that far-left Democrats are using the issue of family separation to push for little to no enforcemen­t of our immigratio­n laws. Mr. Trump often asserts that Democrats want open borders. This latest dust-up reveals he may not be far off.

Polls show the calls to abolish ICE are politicall­y foolish, as Americans oppose eliminatin­g the agency by a 2-to-1 ratio. More moderate Democrats understand that allowing their radical left arm to drive the agenda on this issue would be political suicide. The American people may disagree on immigratio­n policy, but to argue that we should get rid of the agency charged with enforcing our immigratio­n laws won’t sell much with voters outside the tony deep blue enclaves of Manhattan and San Francisco.

The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-journal. All other opinions expressed on the Opinion and Commentary pages are those of the individual artist or author indicated.

The Review-journal welcomes letters to the editor. Letters should not exceed 275 words and must include the writer’s name, mailing address and phone number. Submission­s may be edited and become the property of the Review-journal.

Email letters@reviewjour­nal.com Mail Letters to the Editor

P.O. Box 70

Las Vegas, NV 89125

Fax 702-383-4676 Especially try to borrow to acquire a home, and make the payments confident that the dollars you use are worth less than those you borrowed. Know that over the long haul your property will be inflating nicely right along with the dollar.

Eventually, inflation will give you a little equity. That will allow you to acquire a credit line. Pay your student loans back as they are due, but don’t make extra payments unless you are unusually flush. And, finally, be really nice to your older relatives. They may turn out to be your savings account. and gerrymande­red voting districts to ensure we do not have equal representa­tion in Congress. Remember, Mr. Trump did not win with the majority vote of the country.

Harassing Mr. Trump’s people is a safety valve because people can take only so much. And since they have stolen our legal means of reining in Mr. Trump, we have to use any weapon at our disposal. I applaud Rep. Maxine Waters of California. She is a magnificen­t warrior.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States