Turning ‘a blind eye’ to violence

More evidence of Ferguson effect

Before James Comey became caught in the middle of the Hillary-trump presidential soap opera, he created controversy by citing the “Ferguson effect” in 2016 to explain increasing murder rates in many American cities, including Las Vegas.

“There’s a perception that police are less likely to do the marginal additional policing that suppresses crime — the getting out of your car at 2 in the morning and saying to a group of guys, ‘Hey what are you doing here?’” he said.

His comments angered many on the left, who see institutional racism inherent in many police interactions with those in minority communities. But the evidence keeps mounting that Mr. Comey was on to something.

First came a 2017 Pew Research Center survey of more than 8,000 police officers. The results revealed that, in the wake of high-profile police shootings involving African-americans — including an encounter in Ferguson, Mo. — 75 percent of those questioned said they had become more hesitant to use force. In addition, 73 percent said they were less likely to stop and confront an individual acting suspiciously.

Now comes a USA Today analysis focusing on the Baltimore police in the wake of the 2015 shooting of Freddie Gray, which sparked riots across the city. In the aftermath, “officers in nearly every part of the city appeared to turn a blind eye to everyday violence,” the paper reported this week.

“From 2014 to 2017, dispatch records show that the number of suspected narcotics offenses police reported themselves dropped 30 percent; the number of people they reported seeing with outstanding warrants dropped by half,” USA Today found. “The number of field interviews … dropped by 70 percent.

The results of a more timid police presence? Baltimore has experienced a spike in violent crime that has left it “easily the deadliest large city in the USA,” the paper reported.

There is, of course, nothing wrong with increased focus on police practices, particularly involving the use of force. Such attention heightens accountability and discourages wrongdoing.

But is really so farfetched to think that criminals will become emboldened and more aggressive if police officers worry about becoming entrapped in a “Bonfire of the Vanities” scenario every time they buckle up in a squad car?

Yes, the bad apples must be weeded out of law enforcement, and those who make deadly mistakes should be held responsible. More dialogue and outreach to disadvantaged areas via community policing might also help.

But the USA Today review of Baltimore’s predicament provides more proof that nobody wins — except the bad guys — when conscientious and dedicated law enforcement officers become reluctant to do their jobs.

The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-journal. All other opinions expressed on the Opinion and Commentary pages are those of the individual artist or author indicated.

The Review-journal welcomes letters to the editor. Letters should not exceed 275 words and must include the writer’s name, mailing address and phone number. Submissions may be edited and become the property of the Review-journal.

Email letters@reviewjournal.com Mail Letters to the Editor

P.O. Box 70

Las Vegas, NV 89125

Fax 702-383-4676

These outrageous and detestable acts were unjustified, without merit and reminiscent of the master/ slave syndrome. When white people feel uneasy and uncomfortable around minorities (as outlined), they feel empowered, as if it’s their duty vis-a-vis the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, to call authorities to question the accused while the accusers justify their actions.

The revolving question: Where is the outrage? No one seems to care, as these actions primarily involve African-americans. political opportunists have forced uneconomical tradeoffs while ignoring the costs.

The editorial highlights a study that shows “the widespread adoption of electric vehicles will likely increase air pollution compared with new internal combustion vehicles.” And the tens of billions of dollars spent by taxpayers to subsidize building solar installations and to buy the expensive cars mainly benefits the industries and the politicians who support them.

This is the same scam foisted on consumers who are forced to buy gasoline laced with 10 percent ethanol, which decreases engine efficiency and reduces gas mileage. In essence, we have to buy an extra gallon of gas for every 30 gallons we use. And it has been proven that there is no net improvement in greenhouse gas emissions when using corn-derived ethanol.the only benefits go to the ethanol industry and the corn farmers who supply it.