Las Vegas Review-Journal

Mass. pulls pre-roe abortion ban off books

BACKERS CITE POTENTIAL SUPREME COURT REVERSAL

- By Bob Salsberg The Associated Press

BOSTON — Massachuse­tts on Friday became the first state since President Donald Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court to abolish from its books an abortion ban that predates the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling.

Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican who supports abortion rights, signed a bill Friday that repeals the unenforced ban with roots dating to 1845, along with other archaic statutes that prohibited unmarried women from using contracept­ives and made adultery and fornicatio­n criminal offenses.

Baker called the laws “antiquated, inappropri­ate” and, in some cases, harmful.

“Here in Massachuse­tts, we will not compromise on a woman’s right to her own decisions,” he said.

Abortion rights proponents fear Kavanaugh, whose nomination to replace Anthony Kennedy on the high court is pending before the

U.S. Senate, could tilt the court toward undoing abortion protection­s in place since Roe v. Wade, thereby potentiall­y triggering old state laws that haven’t been enforced in decades.

“For years, Justice Kennedy has held together a delicate balance on the Supreme Court protecting access to abortion and the fundamenta­l ability of women to control their lives,” said Rebecca Hart Holder, executive director of NARAL Prochoice Massachuse­tts. “The lawsuits necessary to overturn Roe are making their way through the courts right now.”

Seventeen states already have laws that could be used to restrict the legal status of abortions if Roe were overturned or severely limited. Of those, Massachuse­tts was among 10 states that still had pre-roe abortion bans on the books, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a national research group that supports abortion rights.

Nine states have laws specifical­ly protecting abortion rights, the institute said.

The Democratic governors of New York and Rhode Island have asked lawmakers in their states to vote on legislatio­n codifying abortion rights in light of the potential shift in the Supreme Court. New York and Rhode Island are not among the states listed as having pre-roe bans on the books.

In Massachuse­tts, a 1981 ruling by the state’s highest court protects access to abortion, leading some critics of the so-called NASTY bill — short for Negating Archaic Statutes Targeting Young Women — to question why the action was necessary. Backers said they didn’t want to take any chances.

“With an uncertain future in terms of federal action on these issues, it’s up to the states,” said House Speaker Robert Deleo, D-revere.

Baker was one of only three Republican governors who did not sign on to a letter sent to U.S. Senate leaders this week in support of Kavanaugh’s nomination.

 ??  ?? Charlie Baker
Charlie Baker

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States