Las Vegas Review-Journal

The Trump tax plan report card

-

When Republican­s were pitching a massive tax cut for corporatio­ns and wealthy families last year, they promised voters many benefits: increased investment, higher wages and a tax cut that pays for itself. The tax plan, congressio­nal leaders said, would turbocharg­e the U.S. economy and provide a much-needed helping hand to working-class families.

“Most people, half the people in this country, live paycheck to paycheck, so there’s a lot of economic anxiety,” House Speaker Paul Ryan told The Times in November. “And I think just one of the key solutions is faster economic growth, more jobs. And I think the best thing we could do to deliver that is tax reform.”

So, more than six months since President Donald Trump signed the tax cut into law, is it delivering on the promises Ryan and other leaders made?

The deficit and the federal debt are growing — and at a stunning pace. In the current fiscal year, the federal government will spend $912 billion more than it collects in revenue, an increase of 39 percent from the 2017 fiscal year.

Buybacks reach new heights

The most notable outcome of the tax law is one that few Republican­s talk about: Companies are buying back their own stock — a lot of it. Stock buybacks are expected to reach a record $1 trillion this year. Since Congress reduced the top federal corporate tax rate to 21 percent from 35 percent, businesses are flush with cash. Lawmakers also let companies repatriate foreign earnings that they had been amassing at a rate of 15.5 percent for cash and 8 percent for other assets.

By buying back shares, businesses are boosting demand for, and thus the price of, their stock. It’s no wonder, then, that the S&P 500 stock index is trading near its high.

Share buybacks have an understand­able appeal to executives, many of whom are compensate­d with stock, and to investors. But buybacks do little for workers, most of whom own little or no stock. It is not even clear that buybacks are in the long-term interest of companies since that money could be used to expand into new markets or invest in technology.

In fact, these buybacks amount to a huge wasted opportunit­y. And this waste wasn’t unexpected. In 2004, Republican­s temporaril­y cut the tax rate on foreign corporate profits, promising that the tax break would spur economic growth and increase wages. Instead, many corporatio­ns bought record amounts of their own shares.

Investment­s have flatlined

With so many companies focusing on buying back stock, a central Republican prediction — that tax cuts would encourage spending on equipment and factories — has not come to fruition. There has been a modest increase in investment this year compared with recent quarters. Companies in the S&P 500 had spent around $147 billion through the end of March. A recent modest uptick began in early 2017, long before the tax cut.

Investment as a percentage of economic output climbed in the first quarter but fell to 17.5 percent in the second, far below the nearly 20 percent it reached in 2006 before the recession. Growth in productivi­ty — which ought to accelerate when businesses invest — was just 0.4 percent in the first quarter.

Real wages have declined

And what happened to that promise of big raises for workers? There has been no sign of them yet.

The typical family would earn $3,000 to $7,000 more a year, the White House Council of Economic Advisers predicted. In fact, real wages are down, largely thanks to the rising price of oil, which has more than offset any increase in income.

Even ignoring inflation, wages are up only 2.7 percent over the past 12 months. Even with the unemployme­nt rate at a low 3.9 percent, businesses are not offering higher pay yet.

The idea that the tax cuts were going to line workers’ pockets was always a mirage. Most people will enjoy only a modest and temporary tax cut — families making between $48,600 and $86,100 will save $930, according to the Urban-brookings Tax Policy Center. Families in the top 1 percent, on the other hand, will save an average of $51,140.

Tax cuts don’t pay for themselves

“Not only will this tax plan pay for itself, but it will pay down debt,” Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said. This statement was absurd when Mnuchin made it, but it looks even more ridiculous now. The deficit and the federal debt are growing — and at a stunning pace. In the current fiscal year, the federal government will spend $912 billion more than it collects in revenue, an increase of 39 percent from the 2017 fiscal year, according to the Congressio­nal Budget Office.

Thanks to the tax cut, the government will take in about 1 percent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it did the year before. Corporate tax revenue is plummeting — the CBO predicts a drop of 27 percent this year. At the same time, the federal government will spend nearly 5 percent more, due, in large part, to Trump’s insistence on more military spending.

Over the coming decades, the federal debt could nearly triple as a share of the gross domestic product if Congress makes the Trump tax cuts and spending increases permanent, according to the Committee for a Responsibl­e Federal Budget. Lawmakers have talked about extending the cuts in last year’s law beyond the next 10 years — something they did with some of the cuts passed during the George W. Bush administra­tion.

Today, many Republican­s seem to realize that the tax cut has become a political liability, which is why they aren’t talking about it before the November election. Even they realize that it hasn’t done any of what they promised.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States