‘Believe women’ is just perilous baloney
Ihave a message for virtue-signaling men who’ve rushed to embrace #Metoo operatives hurling uncorroborated sexual assault allegations into the chaotic court of public opinion. Stuff it.
Your blanket “Believe Women” bloviations are moral and intellectual abominations that insult every human being of sound mind and soul.
A certain class of neverTrump harumphers are leading the charge on behalf of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s partisan accuser Christine Blasey Ford — who cannot recall the year she was allegedly traumatized, where it happened, who threw the party that paralyzed her for nearly four decades, how many were in attendance during her claimed assault, how she got there or how she left.
No matter! ABC News analyst Matthew Dowd doesn’t need any data to analyze. “If this is he said, she said, then let’s believe the she in these scenarios,” he said last week. “She has nothing to gain and everything to lose. For 250 years we have believed the he in these scenarios. Enough is enough.”
That is a dumb and dangerous default. The costly toll of “believing women,” instead of believing evidence, can be seen in the hundreds and hundreds of cases recorded by the University of Michigan Law School’s National Registry of Exonerations involving innocent men falsely accused of rape and rape/murders.
One of those men whose plight I’ve reported on, former Fort Worth police officer Brian Franklin, spent 21 years in prison on a life sentence after he was convicted of sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl in 1995 who had committed perjury on the stand. Franklin vigilantly maintained his innocence, studied law in the prison library and won a reversal of his conviction in 2016.
And just last week, Oregonian Joshua Horner, serving a 50-year sentence for sexual abuse of a young girl, was exonerated after a dog that the accuser had claimed he shot dead was found alive. There had been no DNA, no corroborating witnesses and no other forensic evidence — just the word of a girl whose contradictions and memory problems were explained away as “post-traumatic stress” while an innocent man nearly drowned.
The idea that all women and girls must be telling the truth at all times about sexual assault allegations because they “have nothing to gain” is perilously detached from reality. Retired NYPD detective John Savino, forensic scientist and criminal profiler Brent Turvey and forensic psychologist Aurelio Coronado Mares detail the myriad “prosocial” and “antisocial” lies people tell in their textbook, “False Allegations: Investigative and Forensic Issues in Fraudulent Reports of Crime.”
“Prosocial deceptions” involve specific motives beneficial to both the deceiver and the deceived, including the incentives to “preserve the dignity of others,” to gain “financial benefit” for another, to protect a relationship, “ego-boosting or image protection (of others)” and “protecting others from harm or consequence.
“Antisocial” lies involve selfish motives to “further a personal agenda at some cost to others,” including “self-deception and rationalization to protect or boost self-esteem,” “enhance status or perception in the eyes of others” and to “conceal inadequacy, error and culpability.”
The role of the press should be verification, not validation. Rape is a devastating crime. So is lying about it. It’s not victim blaming to get to the bottom of the truth. It’s liar-shaming. Don’t believe a gender. Believe evidence.
Michelle Malkin is host of “Michelle Malkin Investigates” on CRTV. com. Her email address is writemalkin@gmail.com.