Las Vegas Review-Journal

Government ‘shutdown’ a crisis? Not hardly

-

THIS government shutdown is now longer than any in history. The media keep using the word “crisis.” “Shutdown sows chaos, confusion and anxiety!” says The Washington Post. “Pain spreads widely.” The New York Times headlined, it’s all “just too much!”

But wait. Looking around America, I see people going about their business. I have to ask: Where’s the crisis?

Pundits talk as if government is the most important part of America, but it isn’t. We need some government, limited government. But most of life, the best of life, goes on without government, many of the best parts in spite of government.

Of course, the shutdown is a big deal to the 800,000 people who aren’t being paid. But they will get paid. Government workers always do — after shutdowns.

Columnist Paul Krugman calls this shutdown “Trump’s big libertaria­n experiment.” But it’s not libertaria­n. Government’s excessive rules are still in effect, and eventually government workers will be paid for not working. That makes this a most un-libertaria­n experiment. But there are lessons to be learned.

During a shutdown when Barack Obama was president, government officials were so eager to make a point by inconvenie­ncing people that they even stopped visitors from entering public parks. Trump’s administra­tion isn’t doing that, so PBS found a new crisis: “Trash cans spilling … (P)ark services can’t clean up the mess until Congress and the president reach a spending deal,” reported “Newshour.”

But volunteers appeared to pick up some of the trash. Given a chance, private citizens often step in to do things government says only government can do.

The Washington Post ran a front-page headline about farmers “reeling … because they aren’t receiving government support checks.” But why do farmers even get “support checks”? One justificat­ion is “saving family farms.” But the money goes to big farms. Subsidies are a scam created by politician­s who get money from wheat, cotton, corn and soybean agribusine­sses.

The New York Times shrieks, “Shutdown Curtails FDA Food Inspection­s!” Only if you read on do you learn that meat and poultry inspection is done by the Department of Agricultur­e. They’re still working. And the FDA is restarting some inspection­s as well.

More important, meat is usually safe not because of government — but because of competitio­n. Food sellers know they’ll get bad publicity if they poison people (think Chipotle), so they take many more safety measures than government requires. One meat producer told me that they employ 2,000 more safety inspectors than the law demands.

While pundits and politician­s act as if everything needs government interventi­on, the opposite is true.

Even security work is done better by the private sector. At San Francisco’s airport, security lines move faster. The TSA even acknowledg­ed that those screeners are better at finding contraband. That’s because San Francisco privatized the screening process. Private companies are responsibl­e for security.

Private contractor­s are better because they must compete. Perform badly, and they get fired. But government never fires itself.

Government workers shout, “We are essential!” But I say: “Give me a break. Most of you are not.”

John Stossel is author of “No They Can’t! Why Government Fails — But Individual­s Succeed.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States