Lawyers: Restore case vs. Bundy
Federal judge said they sat on evidence
Federal prosecutors filed opening briefs Wednesday in their appeal of a judge’s dismissal of felony conspiracy and weapons charges against Bunkerville rancher Cliven Bundy and others.
A year ago, U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro threw out the case against Bundy, his sons Ammon and Ryan, and independent militia member Ryan Payne after finding “flagrant prosecutorial misconduct.”
Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth White asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse Navarro’s decision, defending the Justice Department’s actions at trial.
“Any missteps were inadvertent (or at worst negligent), and those errors did not merit the court’s strong condemnation of the prosecution team,” White wrote.
Navarro initially granted a mistrial after finding that the federal government improperly withheld evidence.
Cliven Bundy’s lawyer, Larry Klayman, responded to the government’s brief in a separate filing, calling the appeal “unprofessional and grossly unethical.”
The Bundys and others were charged after an April 2014 armed standoff with federal agents who tried to execute a court order to
round up Cliven Bundy’s cattle.
White argued that the rancher “continues to unlawfully graze cattle.”
Citing “massive disclosures” from the government throughout the case, the prosecutor denied purposefully withholding evidence, including a reported surveillance camera aimed at the Bundy ranch, the FBI’S presence, “snipers” and assessments of threats posed by the Bundys.
She also wrote that in two years leading up to the trial, prosecutors turned over 1.4 terabytes of evidence “after reviewing hundreds of thousands of pages of documents,” while protecting victims, witnesses and law enforcement “from harassment and threats.”
She referenced the June 2014 shooting that left Las Vegas police officers Igor Soldo and Alyn Beck dead “at the hands of two of Bundy’s extremist followers.”