Las Vegas Review-Journal

What the FDA’S actions mean for dietary supplement­s

- By Candice Choi The Associated Press

NEW YORK — The Food and Drug Administra­tion announced plans Monday to step up its policing of dietary supplement­s, which it said has mushroomed into a $40 billion industry with more than 50,000 products. The agency warned 17 companies for illegally making claims about their products’ ability to treat diseases.

Here’s a look at what the FDA’S announceme­nt means:

How are dietary supplement­s regulated?

Dietary supplement­s, including vitamins, are regulated more like foods than drugs. They can make claims similar to what’s found on cereals or snack bars such as “calcium builds strong bones.” But they can’t contain drug ingredient­s or make claims about treating diseases like Alzheimer’s, cancer or diabetes.

Does the FDA plan to change that rule?

No. FDA Commission­er Scott Gottlieb said the agency isn’t questionin­g what’s permitted under the dietary supplement­s law of 1994. He said dietary supplement­s are regulated like foods because they pose less of a risk than drugs.

“Nothing in what we’re doing would try to attempt to re-contemplat­e” the existing standard, he said.

Instead, the agency is addressing criticism that it hasn’t enforced rules prohibitin­g supplement­s from containing drugs or being marketed like them. Gottlieb said the risk posed by such illegal products has grown with the industry.

The FDA’S dietary supplement­s review group has 23 employees, he said, and is planning more oversight on products that make illegal health claims.

What about supplement­s that don’t make disease claims?

Qualified health claims on dietary supplement­s may lead people to think they’re more effective than they are, said Peter Lurie, a former

FDA official who now heads the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Lurie noted the FDA doesn’t review such claims before they’re marketed.

“It’s very hard to take on this industry comprehens­ively when the law shackles the agency to the extent that it does,” he said.

Dr. Pieter Cohen, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School, said dietary supplement­s are unnecessar­y for most people unless a doctor recommends them for a specific reason. He noted there are exceptions, such as women who may be planning to become pregnant.

Is the FDA considerin­g any changes to the rules for supplement­s?

The FDA is still figuring out exactly how it might tighten oversight, but one possibilit­y is a mandatory database for dietary supplement­s to improve transparen­cy and make enforcemen­t easier. It also said it’s developing a way to more quickly and consistent­ly alert people about supplement­s that might have illegal ingredient­s.

The dietary supplement­s industry group, the Council for Responsibl­e Nutrition, said it looked forward to working with the FDA, and praised Gottlieb for “rooting out bad actors.”

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsibl­e for all content.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States