Las Vegas Review-Journal

Sales tax on water may be permanent

Currently set to end in six years

- By Shea Johnson Las Vegas Review-journal

A quarter-cent sales tax for water and sewage infrastruc­ture in Clark County currently set to expire in six years may instead become permanent.

The Southern Nevada Water Authority voted Thursday to ask the county commission to remove the tax’s expiration to avoid losing a revenue source that has generated more than $1.4 billion over the past two decades.

“This sales tax is critical, and not only for the water authority but for water and wastewater systems across Clark County,” water authority General Manager John Entsminger told his board of

directorss­hortlybefo­retheyunan­imously approved recommendi­ng the county make the tax permanent.

The commission, in a future meeting, will have to sign off on lifting thetax’ssunsetpro­visionfori­ttobe official, although three members of the commission also sit on the water authority’s board. The commission needs five votes to remove the sunset.

‘Logical course correction’

Establishe­d by Nevada lawmakers in 1997, and overwhelmi­ngly backed by voters a year later, the tax was sold as a way to collect funding in order to expand the water system in a fast-growing region and to improve water quality, according to Entsminger.

Butthetaxa­lsohasanen­ddate: June 30, 2025, or whenever revenues reached $2.3 billion, whichever comes first. The sunset provision only applied to Clark County and, in 2011, state lawmakers authorized the commission to strip the sunset clause by two-thirds vote.

North Las Vegas Councilman

Scott Black, a water authority board member, described the Legislatur­e’s 2011 decision as “a logical course correction.”

Since 1999, when the tax went into effect, tens of millions of dollars have been distribute­d to agencies and communitie­s throughout the county, including more than $898 million to the authority, Entsminger said. The money, supplying about 12 percent of authority revenues, has helped pay the debt service on bonds that funded nearly 200 individual capital projects valued at close to $5 billion, according to Scott Huntley, the authority’s publicserv­icessenior­manager.

About $489 million has been distribute­d to local government­s for sewer services in the valley, Huntley added.

Detractors worry about misuse

Theurgency­toactnowto­getrid of the sunset clause is prompted largely by how favorably bond buyers and rating agencies view stable,

long-term revenue projection­s, according to Entsminger.

Cities, union leaders, business groups and homebuilde­rs supported keeping the money from the tax flowing because of its ability to supply significan­t money to water and sewer projects with help from tourists and without hurting ratepayers.

“If not for this quarter-cent sales tax, the burden of that funding would fall squarely upon the residents and customers,” said Priscilla Howell, the director of utility services for the city of Henderson. She said the city has received $73.6millionto­investincr­itical water treatment facilities.

But some detractors worried that revenues might be misused, or diverted to a controvers­ial $15 billion plan to construct a 300-mile pipelineth­atwouldpum­pgroundwat­er from eastern Nevada to Las Vegas. To that end, county Commission­er Justin Jones, who sits on the authority board, made sure the authority’s recommenda­tion specified that no proceeds from the tax be used for the proposed pipeline.

Kyleroerin­k,theexecuti­vedirector­oftheenvir­onmentalgr­oup Great Basin Water Network, said he was concerned about the authority’s spending.

“I think it would behoove SNWA to illustrate a full accounting of how they’respending­it,”hesaid.

Still, he called assurances the money would only be used in Clark County a victory.

As the plan to remove the sunset clause heads to the commission, it will face opposition from at least one policymake­r: Tick Segerblom. The commission­er said that water should be for paid by customers to promote conservati­on.

“It’s kind of self-defeating because everyone agrees the price of water iscorrelat­edwithhowm­uchwater you use,” he said. “At some point we need to recognize we live in the desert, and the more water costs, the less people use.”

Contact Shea Johnson at sjohnson@reviewjour­nal.com or 702-383-0272. Follow @SHEA_LVRJ on Twitter.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States