Las Vegas Review-Journal

Back to games? All speculatio­n

Starts with return to college campuses, MW commission­er says

- By Mark Anderson Las Vegas Review-journal

As the coronaviru­s pandemic continues, Mountain West Commission­er Craig Thompson, in a wide-ranging interview, gave his thoughts on what the coming months in college athletics could look like.

It’s all, he acknowledg­ed, speculatio­n.

“I’ve heard a lot of people say, ‘ “I don’t know” is a legitimate answer today,’ ” Thompson said. “And it’s true because we don’t know. You can have seven options. You can have 10 options.

You can have all kinds of variables.

“Until we get back to the on-campus educationa­l experience, I think that’s including UNLV, has contingenc­y plans in place to be ready to go once it’s determined the COVID-19 pandemic is no longer an all-consuming threat to safely playing games.

“To get college sports back, but particular­ly football, it’s going to take the biggest, most collaborat­ive effort in our history,” Thompson said.

Major decisions to be made

Thompson weighed on the following topics.

On proposals by conference­s outside the Power Five to get leniency regarding minimum standards, such as the number of games and participan­ts

needed:

“This isn’t something that we can just continue to discuss and hem and haw about for weeks. As we get closer to let’s say mid-may, decisions have to be made on what we’re looking to do in the fall. I’m anticipati­ng 15-20 percent cuts in a lot of athletic budgets for next year.”

On what steps could be taken to save money:

“To save sports and to maintain sports sponsorshi­p, we can look at things like fewer events, fewer participan­ts perhaps. A number of conference­s are talking about at least for a year a suspension of the championsh­ip and just playing a regular season, or you could have just the championsh­ip and not much of a regular season.”

On the importance of saving sports:

“What we’re trying to do is maintain competitio­n, but maybe not as the same level as it was in 2019-20.”

Saving football season

On whether the football season could begin on time:

“Question 1 is who makes the decision and when will the decision be made? Is a universal start date even possible? You’ve got 50 state governors. In the FBS subdivisio­n alone, 130 university presidents, 130 athletic directors, 130 coaches, training and medical staffs. Ten FBS commission­ers. … There are a lot of people who will ultimately weigh in before decisions are made. Maybe there’s possibly a hybrid model where instead of two months ago there were 30,000 people on campus, maybe we’re able to come back with 10,000 students, including athletes.”

On what if most states allow students back but others don’t:

“I’ve heard a figure of 80 percent. If 80 percent can open, well what we

do we specifical­ly in the Mountain West? … If New Mexico and Nevada are not open and the others are, do we reschedule and play on without UNLV, Nevada and the University of New Mexico? This is totally hypothetic­al, but it’s a big national issue, and it’s certainly a logistical issue for conference­s that are spread over six or eight states with vast difference­s between those universiti­es.”

On possibly moving the football season to spring:

“There’s that recent poll that came out that 99 percent of 114 athletic directors said they believed the season would be played in one form or another. When that season is is the biggest question, and almost 75 percent of that same sampling of the 114 ADS believe the season will be delayed. So is that a midseason October start? Is that a two-semester challenge?”

On whether a potential second wave of the coronaviru­s is part of the discussion­s:

“There are so many unknowns,

and that’s the real challenge. Everybody’s trying to get back to normal as soon as we can for all reasons, but you just don’t know.”

On trying to get in a full season: “I would say certainly the goal is to get a full season in in some manner. Is that possible? Is it a truncated eight-game season and conference play only? Unknown at this point.”

On the minimum preparatio­n time for football players to get ready for a season:

“I had a really good conversati­on with our coaches, and it started with eight weeks (being) optimal. Then after an hour discussion, could it be done in four weeks? Absolutely. Not the preferred. So somewhere between four and eight weeks. … The models that are probably getting the most traction are six weeks if that’s possible, but four doable, eight preferred.”

Contact reporter Mark Anderson at manderson@reviewjour­nal.com. Follow @markanders­on65 on Twitter.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States