Las Vegas Review-Journal

A restaurant rebound is not on the table

-

WHEN the Wisconsin Supreme Court struckdown­the governor’s stay-at-home order, several bars and restaurant­s immediatel­y reopened, and customers came.theresortt­ownof Lake Geneva attracted a horde of tourists eager to eat, drink and mingle.

The implicatio­n was clear: Americans are tired of isolation and are unafraid of getting sick. If we lift the restrictio­ns that have shut down so many of these places, people will go back to doing what they used to.

But will they? I doubt it.

It’s not surprising that those who resent the stayat-home order would rush out to celebrate its end. But aburstofbu­sinessfrom pent-up demand is not likely to last. A relatively small group of devil-may-care types won’t show up every night or at every place that reopens.

Ihadaresta­urantreser­vation the weekend of

March 14-15, before a single state had shut down. But everyonein­ourpartyof­four agreed that the hazards of dining out were too much to justify. So we stayed away. So did others. The reservatio­n system Opentable reported that, by then, restaurant bookings were down 42 percent from a year earlier.

There are people who would be happy to eat out or sit at a bar during a pandemic. But unlike going to the grocery or pharmacy to get essential supplies, it’s not something everyone has to do. If you’re tired of cooking, you can get takeout from your favorite place and enjoy an excellent chef-prepared meal without breathing other people’s droplets. In some places, you can even get cocktails to go.

The experience we so fondly remember is not what we can expect in the foreseeabl­e future. Half the appeal of sitting down in a bistro or tavern is enjoying the noise of social engagement, the distractio­n from worries and the warmth ofaconvivi­alcrowd.but widely spaced tables and bar stools, masked servers and the lurking threat of contagion will dampen the atmosphere.

The new conditions may be tolerable, but people generally don’t go out in hopes of having a tolerable time.

People who really want to go back to their familiar haunts, like those patrons in Wisconsin, can probably put the risk out of their minds, with the aid of alcohol. But not most of us. A Morning Consult poll this month found that only 18 percent of adults would feel comfortabl­e eating in a restaurant. Compare that with 2017, when 61 percent dined out at least once a week.

Even customers who would disregard the risks of dining inside may not want to spend the money. A surge of unemployme­nt and a dismal economic outlook are good reasons to cut back on luxuries. If you lose your job, you don’t have much discretion­ary income. If you fear losing your job, you’ll want to conserve your money.

Between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2009, during the Great Recession, about 4,000 U.S. restaurant­s went out of business. The downturn forced Starbucks to close more than 600 outlets. All that destructio­n occurred without the threat of a dangerous virus.

In the months ahead, there will be restaurant­s and bars that survive and flourish like oases in the desert. But surroundin­g them will be a lot of sand.

Steve Chapman blogs at www.chicagotri­bune.com/ news/opinion/chapman. Follow him on Twitter @Stevechapm­an13.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States