Las Vegas Review-Journal

Justices favor religious rights

In 7-2 rulings, Supreme Court sides with Trump, employers

- By Jessica Gresko The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled broadly Wednesday in favor of the religious rights of employers in two cases that could leave more than 70,000 women without free contracept­ion and tens of thousands of people with no way to sue for job discrimina­tion.

In both cases the court ruled 7-2, with both liberal and conservati­ve justices ruling in favor of the Trump administra­tion and religious employers.

In the more prominent of the two cases, involving President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, the justices greenlight­ed changes the Trump administra­tion had sought.

The administra­tion announced in 2017 that it would allow more employers to opt out of providing the no-cost birth control coverage required under the law, but lower courts had blocked the changes.

Another particular­ly important decision for Trump is ahead. The justices are expected to announce Thursday whether Congress and the Manhattan district attorney can see the president’s taxes and other financial records he has fought hard to keep private.

On Wednesday, White House spokeswoma­n Kayleigh Mcenany joined conservati­ve groups in cheering the court’s contracept­ion decision. “Today’s Supreme Court ruling is a big win for religious freedom and freedom of conscience,” she said in a statement.

Liberal groups and Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, decried the decision, which she called a “fundamenta­l misreading” of the health care law.

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority of the court, said in Wednesday’s decision that the administra­tion had the authority to make the changes and followed appropriat­e procedures in doing so.

The government had previously estimated that the rule changes would cause between 70,000 women and 126,000 women to lose contracept­ion coverage in one year.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg cited those numbers in dissenting.

“Today, for the first time, the Court casts totally aside countervai­ling rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree,” she wrote in a dissent joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

Separately Wednesday, the Supreme Court sided with two Catholic schools in California in a decision underscori­ng that certain employees of religious schools can’t sue for employment discrimina­tion.

The court had ruled unanimousl­y in 2012 that the Constituti­on prevents ministers from suing their churches for employment discrimina­tion, but the justices didn’t rigidly define who counts as a minister.

The case the justices decided Wednesday involved two Catholic school teachers who taught religion as part of their jobs and who sued their schools for discrimina­tion after their contracts were not renewed.

“When a school with a religious mission entrusts a teacher with the responsibi­lity of educating and forming students in the faith, judicial interventi­on into disputes between the school and the teacher threatens the school’s independen­ce in a way that the First Amendment does not allow,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority, saying the teachers’ lawsuits should not be allowed to go forward.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States