Las Vegas Review-Journal

In a changing military, Army eases rules for women’s hair

- By Dave Philipps

As an Army National Guard officer who has deployed all over the world, Capt. Jawana Mcfadden always felt the Army’s strict rules toward women’s hair needlessly compromise­d who she was as a person and how she performed as a soldier.

In civilian life, Mcfadden has what she calls “tons of curls, and big poofy hair that I love.” But for 22 years, when it came time to put on her uniform, she had to use gel and a hot comb to comply with requiremen­ts that women have short hair or a tight, discipline­d bun.

The bun pushed her helmet forward over her eyes, she said, so that “when you got down in a fighting position, you couldn’t see.”

“It wasn’t just that my self and my traditions weren’t reflected in what it means to be a soldier,” Mcfadden said in an interview from her home in Inglewood, Calif. “It also just didn’t work.”

In a military increasing­ly dependent on women, and particular­ly Black women, that is now changing.

The latest update to the Army’s uniform and grooming regulation­s, which took effect Friday, offers several revisions that give the 127,000 women serving in the Army and National Guard a chance to finally let their hair down — at least a bit.

For the first time, women will be allowed to have buzz cuts. And they will be able to wear combinatio­ns of styles, such as locks pulled back in a ponytail, which for years were off limits. The new rules allow short ponytails at all times, and long ponytails in combat and in training when a bun might otherwise interfere with equipment.

“It’s long overdue,” Mcfadden said of the change. “It shows that the Army is recognizin­g we can be soldiers and still be ourselves, that being a soldier and a Black woman is valid and valued.”

The new regulation­s are tucked among reams of standards that stipulate everything from who can wear capes (officers only) to whether soldiers can stand with their hands in their pockets (no). While permitting ponytails may seem tepid in the freewheeli­ng world of civilian fashion, for women in uniform the changes offer not only welcome flexibilit­y, but a growing sign that the Army is listening, and slowly moving away from military standards that in the past generally let them serve only to the extent that they agreed to look and act like men.

Women will now also be able to have highlights in their hair and wear conservati­ve shades of lipstick and nail polish, so long as they are not “eccentric, exaggerate­d, or faddish,” and they can wear stud earrings while not in field training or combat.

And the regulation­s for the first time

include guidance on breastfeed­ing, allowing soldiers to wear a specifical­ly designed nursing T-shirt under their camouflage coat, and authorizin­g women to unzip the uniform and, without using a cover, “breastfeed anywhere the soldier and child are otherwise authorized to be.”

The share of women in the military has grown steadily since World War II, though during the early years of integratio­n the allmale leadership kept women in token nursing and secretaria­l roles, often with their rank and pay capped. Families were considered a breach of regulation­s. Women who became pregnant in uniform were automatica­lly discharged until 1972, when a young lawyer named Ruth Bader Ginsburg helped take the Defense Department to the Supreme Court.

Since the 1970s, the number of women in the Army has grown from about 2% to about 15% of the force. In recent years, they have integrated into nearly all combat units and been promoted to senior leadership positions.

Today the once-reluctant military is now actively seeking to make serving more attractive to women, said Kate Germano, a retired Marine Corps lieutenant colonel and former head of the Service Women’s Action Network, an advocate for women in uniform, because leaders realize they cannot succeed without them.

“It’s a matter of national defense,” Germano said. “We just don’t have enough male candidates to do the job.”

The military has developed an especially outsize reliance on Black women, who, Germano noted, account for nearly a third of all women in the military, even though they make up only about 15% of the civilian female population. Black women now serve in the military at a far higher rate than any other demographi­c group.

“The military offers a lot of opportunit­ies for people we don’t traditiona­lly see as soldiers. They are taking advantage of that,” Germano said. “And it is slowly reshaping our image of what a soldier is.”

The most recent grooming changes were recommende­d by a panel of 10 Black women, four white women, one Hispanic woman, one Hispanic man and one Black man drawn from both low- and high-ranking soldiers..

Though the military in the past resisted accommodat­ions for women, it now recognizes that people from all background­s need a voice in what it means to be a soldier, said Michael Grinston, the sergeant major of the Army, in an interview this week.

“When I started in the Army, the saying was ‘All I see is green,’” said Grinston, who joined the Army as an artillery soldier in 1987 and holds the Army’s most senior enlisted position. The saying was a way of expressing that, regardless of sex, race or background, the Army treated all soldiers the same. “Recently, someone told me, ‘When you say that, you don’t see all of me,’” he said. Seeing everyone as identical kept him and other leaders from understand­ing the unique challenges and contributi­ons of individual­s, he added. “That was really powerful.”

The sergeant major, a decorated combat veteran who last summer spoke candidly about his own struggles with growing up as the son of a white mother and a Black father, has been an outspoken champion of inclusion initiative­s. He said a broader feeling of belonging makes soldiers perform better and ultimately makes the Army stronger.

“Our goal was to create a Standard that everyone could see themselves in,” he said while announcing the new grooming guidelines in a message on Twitter in January.

Asked if men’s facial hair would be the next frontier, Grinston laughed and said he received several comments every week from soldiers yearning for beards. The Army currently has authorized about 550 men to grow beards under religious exceptions, but all other facial hair beyond mustaches that are “trimmed, tapered, and tidy” is forbidden.

The sergeant major said beards would probably get serious considerat­ion in the next round of updates. The Army is a learning organizati­on, he added. “Just because we’ve done something for the first hundred years doesn’t mean we have to do it for the next hundred years.”

 ?? GABRIELLA ANGOTTI-JONES / THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Capt. Jawana Mcfadden adjusts her ponytail Feb. 20 at Joint Forces Training Base Los Alamitos in Los Alamitos, Calif. Mcfadden always felt the Army’s rules toward women’s hair were needlessly strict. Last week, the Army relaxed some of those rules.
GABRIELLA ANGOTTI-JONES / THE NEW YORK TIMES Capt. Jawana Mcfadden adjusts her ponytail Feb. 20 at Joint Forces Training Base Los Alamitos in Los Alamitos, Calif. Mcfadden always felt the Army’s rules toward women’s hair were needlessly strict. Last week, the Army relaxed some of those rules.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States