Las Vegas Review-Journal

NCA A Tournament: Vegas picks and preview of the West Region

- CASE KEEFER TALKING POINTS FOLLOW HIM ON TWITTER @CASEKEEFER A version of this column was posted on lasvegassu­n.com. Editor’s note: This is part 4 of a four-part series previewing the NCA A Tournament with picks on everygame. case.keefer@lasvegassu­n.com

Gonzaga sits as a borderline historic favorite in overall tournament futures, so naturally that extends to its odds to reach the Final Four by winning the East Region.

In the Circa Sports yes/no futures market, Gonzaga is listed at -190 (risking $1.90 to win $1) on the “yes” to win the East with the “no” coming back at +150 (risking $1 to win $1.50). That implies a roughly 63% chance the Bulldogs reach the national semifinals for the second time in school history.

That sounds about right, if not a tad low, considerin­g the perception of the rest of the Bulldogs’ initial bracket. The East has regularly been called the weakest region, and while that may ultimately check out from a power-rating perspectiv­e, the region might be closer to the other three than advertised.

There are some land mines here for Gonzaga to navigate. If the bracket holds to form, the Bulldogs would have to beat an Oklahoma team that was considered a championsh­ip contender a couple months ago, the most recent national champion in Virginia, and an Iowa side led by likely National Player of the Year Luka Garza.

Gonzaga would be sizable favorites in each of those games, and will be sizable favorites in every game it plays regardless, but that doesn’t mean everything. This is March Madness, after all, and upsets are inevitable.

The Bulldogs just must avoid falling into one in the East Region, or risk being remembered as the ultimate chokers. Convention­al wisdom suggests they should waltz through this set of teams, and on the surface, it mostly checks out.

Read on for picks on every first-round game in the West Region, separated into three confidence categories — plays, leans and guesses — and listed in rough order of confidence. Lines are the best currently available in Las Vegas on the chosen side.

No. 7 seed Oregon -5.5 vs. No. 10 seed Virginia Commonweal­th, over/under: 137.5.

After a season full of injuries and interrupti­ons, Oregon finally appears to be at full strength and capable of big things. The Ducks fit with so many factors anyone looks for going into the tournament: They’re experience­d, explosive and peaking. Problem is, everyone knows it. Backing them, at least here, requires paying a premium. A big one. Oregon should beat VCU but there’s not much to suggest that it should do so comfortabl­y. The Rams’ defense will harass the Ducks, who are prone to turnovers. Oregon, meanwhile, will have its hands full with Bones Hyland, a skilled scorer who should be able to cut through a mediocre defense. VCU is a surefire play at 6, but with not much to like in this region, I’ll stretch it and take a half-point worse in what should be a close Oregon win.

VCU +5.5.

Play: No. 5 seed Creighton -7 vs. No. 12 Uc-santa Barbara, over/ under: 138.

It’s too bad these two teams are playing each other. Powered by efficient offenses and coming out of underrated conference­s, they both look like buy-on teams. Well, that is, if you don’t think Creighton has quit on coach Greg Mcdermott after his offensive comments in a postgame speech that resulted in a one-game suspension. Some are convinced that is the case, which helped cause this line to get as low as 5.5 after opening at 8. The Blue Jays were the clear side at 5.5 or 6, but there’s been some buyback since. Now the number is back closer to where it should be, but Creighton still has clear advantages in shooting and defense. Narratives can become widespread enough to unduly influence NCA A Tournament lines, and this might be one case where it’s happening — albeit only slightly now that the line is drifting back into place. Lean: Creighton -7.

No. 3 seed Kansas -10.5 vs. No. 14 seed Eastern Washington, over/under: 143.5.

This year’s Kansas team is not strong for the program’s standards, but its defense is a sight to behold. It should stifle Eastern Washington, which grades out as solid but not outstandin­g across the board. Positive coronaviru­s tests that forced Kansas out of the Big 12 conference tournament don’t appear to be much of a factor considerin­g the Jayhawks are in the bubble and practicing. They’ll be without Jalen Wilson but David Mccormack is expected to play. That’s another nugget of positive news, as Kansas relies on Mccormack significan­tly more, of the two starting big men. Kansas had won three straight and eight of nine before prematurel­y exiting the conference tournament and was playing better than it had been all season. Kansas -10.5.

Lean: No. 2 seed Iowa -14.5 vs. No. 15 seed Grand Canyon, over/ under: 145.

Iowa feels like the anti-oregon — a team everyone seemingly wants to fade after a relatively rough end to the season and a couple current, nagging injuries. It’s curious in the sense that the Hawkeyes hold the profile of a side the betting public would typically love. Unlike some of its Big Ten brethren, and perhaps its own misguided program reputation, Iowa is all offense. Luka Garza and Joe Wieskamp, who played in the Big Ten Conference Tournament on a bad ankle, pour in points and eventually overwhelm with their scoring ability. Grand Canyon just might be overwhelme­d. The Antelopes are young and not particular­ly good defensivel­y, where they struggle to create turnovers. If Iowa dictates the pace of this game, and Iowa will at least try to dictate the pace of this game, then it could get out of hand.

Iowa -14.5.

Guess: No. 4 seed Virginia -7 vs. No. 13 seed Ohio, over/under: 131.

Never before has an ACC regular-season champion and (de facto) defending national champion ever been doubted more than Virginia is this year. And the skepticism around the Hoos started long before their recent coronaviru­s outbreak that caused them to pull out of the ACC tournament. The positive test that forced Virginia into quarantine is a concern, especially since it didn’t arrive in Indianapol­is until Friday and only got in one practice before playing the Bobcats. It’s tough to quantify just how much of an effect all the disruption will have, but the market is estimating it’s significan­t, considerin­g this line opened at 10.5. That feels like too much considerin­g the infrastruc­ture in place at Virginia under one of the nation’s best coaches in Tony Bennett. Ohio is well-coached and talented too, but young and probably a year off from a chance at a real tournament run. Guess: Virginia -7.

No. 8 seed Oklahoma -1 vs. No. 9 seed Missouri, over/ under: 139.

This is as tough as any game on the board and I’ve flip-flopped my pick multiple times. Oklahoma has the higher potential — as seen in its aforementi­oned midseason run — but also perhaps the lower floor, considerin­g it lost four of its last five games. All of the games were close, though. Missouri’s not exactly arriving to the big dance in glistening fashion either, having gone 2-3 straight-up,

1-4 against the spread in its last five games. Oklahoma’s Austin Reaves should be the best player on the floor, which also makes a difference. Missouri might have been the take at the opening price of +2, but this is so close that Oklahoma is preferable as the line trends towards a pick’em. Oklahoma -1.

Guess: No. 6 seed USC -6.5 vs. No. 11 seed Drake, over/under: 136.5.

Drake’s 53-52 win agaisnt Wichita State in a First Four game Thursday was as sloppy as it gets, which appears to have overly influenced this line. It’s at least a half-point too high based on the full season’s worth of data. Yes, Drake may struggle with USC’S

athleticis­m. But USC should struggle with Drake’s deliberate, well-executed offensive sets. The Bulldogs opened the game pretty rough against the Shockers but played better than they’re being given credit in erasing a 12-point deficit in the final 11 minutes and holding on for the win. They should come out more comfortabl­e against the Trojans. Drake +6.5.

Play: No. 1 seed Gonzaga -33 vs. No. 16 seed Norfolk State, over/ under: 154.5.

Norfolk State has ridden a 3-point shooting heater through the end of the season, the Mid-eastern Athletic conference tournament and its First Four game. The problem with heaters is they eventually flame out. The Spartans finally cooled off in the second half Thursday against Appalachia­n State, barely eking out a 54-53 win, and chances are it continues against Gonzaga. The Bulldogs are too long and athletic to give the Spartans many open shots. Gonzaga -19.5 in the first half might be worth a look because the overall No. 1 seed will surely allow its starters to play that long. Coach Mark Few may start pulling players early in the second half, so a backdoor cover is a possibilit­y but this line isn’t outrageous. Gonzaga is just this much better than Norfolk State. Guess: Gonzaga -33.

 ?? DAVID BECKER / ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Gonzaga forward Drew Timme (2) vies for a rebound against Saint Mary’s during their game March 8 at the West Coast Conference tournament in Las Vegas.
DAVID BECKER / ASSOCIATED PRESS Gonzaga forward Drew Timme (2) vies for a rebound against Saint Mary’s during their game March 8 at the West Coast Conference tournament in Las Vegas.
 ?? MICHAEL CONROY / ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Iowa center Luka Garza (55) averages 23.7 points and 8.8 rebounds per game this season, and has 12 double-doubles on the year. Iowa had won eight of nine games before losing to Illinois, 82-71, March 13 in the Big Ten conference tournament in Indianapol­is.
MICHAEL CONROY / ASSOCIATED PRESS Iowa center Luka Garza (55) averages 23.7 points and 8.8 rebounds per game this season, and has 12 double-doubles on the year. Iowa had won eight of nine games before losing to Illinois, 82-71, March 13 in the Big Ten conference tournament in Indianapol­is.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States