Las Vegas Review-Journal

Applicant for NSHE post demands job search be restarted

- By Julie Wootton-greener Contact Julie Wootton-greener at jgreener@reviewjour­nal.com or 702-387-2921. Follow @julieswoot­ton on Twitter.

A Las Vegas attorney who applied for a high-paying Nevada System of Higher Education post alleges his applicatio­n wasn’t “lawfully reviewed” and is calling on the Board of Regents to halt the search process.

James Dean Leavitt — who served on NSHE’S Board of Regents for 12 years, including as board chairman — applied over the summer for the board’s chief of staff and special counsel position but was rejected.

His attorney, Christian Gabroy, sent a seven-page letter dated Oct. 14 to select NSHE officials demanding that the search process be “started anew” and that a meeting originally scheduled for Thursday at which finalists for the job may have been interviewe­d be canceled. The meeting was listed Tuesday on NSHE’S website as “postponed.”

Among those receiving the complaint were Chief General Counsel Joe Reynolds, Chancellor Melody Rose, Human Resources Director Sherry Olson, Interim Chief of Staff Keri Nikolajews­ki, board Chair

Cathy Mcadoo and board Vice Chair and search committee Chair Patrick Carter.

Leavitt, 59, alleged in the letter that Nikolajews­ki determined he didn’t meet minimum qualificat­ions for the job “in order to benefit her believed preferred candidate.”

He also alleged “unreasonab­le, unprofessi­onal, and unlawful conduct” by Nikolajews­ki, Olson, Mcaddo and Carter. He said they should be excluded if a renewed job search is launched as requested “due to belief of bias and prejudice against Mr. Leavitt and possibly other individual­s who have likely been improperly excluded from the prior and current search process.”

The posting for the position, which offers a starting salary of $180,000 to $220,000, lists minimum qualificat­ions as a Juris Doctor degree, current membership in the Nevada Bar and at least five years of “progressiv­e experience directly applicable to the position.” Leavitt meets all three criteria, Gabroy said.

‘Inexplicab­le and highly suspect’

“It is inexplicab­le and highly suspect that Mr. Leavitt with 17 years of higher education experience and 29 years of legal experience was determined not to be minimally qualified, when others with none or minimal higher education experience were apparently advanced,” the attorney wrote.

In an interview Tuesday, Gabroy also said he and his client still haven’t received any valid reason from the system as to why he didn’t meet the minimum qualificat­ions for the job. He added that the best candidate should be selected for the position, not someone’s best friend.

An NSHE spokesman declined to comment Tuesday.

Carter, the head of the search committee, said Tuesday it would be inappropri­ate to comment on an active search.

The hunt for a new chief of staff and special counsel already was in limbo after the job search committee voted 5-1 on Aug. 16 to “fail” the current process to broaden the applicant pool. Regent Jason Geddes opposed the move, calling it unnecessar­y.

Regent John Moran, who is also an attorney, raised concerns at a subsequent meeting on Sept. 30 meeting about whether the committee had violated the state open meeting law by failing to provide adequate public notice. NSHE deputy general counsel Tina Russom said she didn’t believe that was the case.

First search led to four finalists

The job was originally posted in early July and was open through July 30, Olson, the system’s HR director, told the search committee. NSHE had 27 candidates for the position, and of those, 11 met minimum qualificat­ions, six were selected as semifinali­sts and four were deemed finalists by the search committee.

Leavitt’s allegation­s are the latest accusing board members of improper conduct this month.

Rose accused Mcadoo and Carter in an Oct. 4 memo of creating a hostile work environmen­t. The board leaders announced last week that an independen­t third party, which they did not identify, will investigat­e the accusation­s but have not commented on the substance of the memo.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States