Las Vegas Review-Journal

Report offers no support for lab-leak theory

- Michael Hiltzik Michael Hiltzik is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times.

For months, adherents of the theory that COVID-19 originated in a Chinese government laboratory have hoped that an assessment President Joe Biden ordered from the nation’s intelligen­ce agencies would validate their suspicions.

Their hopes are now dashed. The intelligen­ce report was declassifi­ed and released Oct. 29. It effectivel­y demolishes the lab-leak theory.

The release of the full report follows the publicatio­n of a brief declassifi­ed summary in August, stressing the intelligen­ce community’s inability to reach a firm conclusion about whether SARS-COV-2, the virus responsibl­e for the COVID pandemic, originated from natural sources or a Chinese laboratory.

The latest version, which is likely to be the most complete assessment to be released publicly, is couched in the same conditiona­l and qualified language.

The report avoids offering a firm conclusion about the two prevailing theories. But it provides details of the agencies’ findings that make clear they looked into the specific assertions that have been proposed in support of the lab-leak theory and found them wanting.

The intelligen­ce agencies also noted that although no animal source for the virus has yet been identified, that doesn’t necessaril­y undermine the theory of a natural source.

In many previous outbreaks, the report says, “the identifica­tion of animal sources has taken years, and in some cases, animal sources have not been identified.”

The report was published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligen­ce, an umbrella agency for 17 government intelligen­ce services, including the CIA, FBI, four Cabinet agencies and the intelligen­ce arms of the military services.

Experts who were contacted by the intelligen­ce services preparing the report have said they were impressed by the agents’ commitment to a scientific analysis. “These folks were really knowledgea­ble, had Ph.d.s in molecular biology, they had read all of the papers in detail,” Tulane virologist Robert Garry told science writer Amy Maxmen of Nature in August.

The lab-leak theory has been kept on life support for more than a year by partisan propagandi­sts, abetted by amateurs posting on social media and credulous journalist­s reluctant to relinquish a story that would be, as the saying goes, “interestin­g, if true.”

The hypothesis that the virus escaped from a Chinese laboratory to wreak havoc on the world originated with a clutch of anti-china ideologues in the State Department under Trump.

In its initial incarnatio­n, the hypothesis held that the virus was developed by the Beijing government as a biological weapon. Its proponents soon abandoned that claim as too fantastica­l to win over many believers, so they retreated to the claim that it was merely geneticall­y engineered in standard virologica­l research and reached the outside world through inattentio­n or accident.

In its most recent form, the theory is that a precursor virus was brought from the wild to a Chinese lab in Wuhan and evolved there, and that was what sneaked out into the open.

The intelligen­ce assessment dismisses the first two versions outright. It suggests that while it’s “plausible” that a lab worker unwittingl­y became the carrier, that’s “less likely than an infection occurring through numerous hunters, farmers, merchants, and others who have frequent, natural contact with animals.”

The report states that the agencies judged the bioweapon allegation to be “supported by scientific­ally invalid claims,” adding that its “proponents are suspected of spreading disinforma­tion.”

It says the intelligen­ce agencies found no “genetic signatures in SARS-COV-2” that would indicate genetic engineerin­g, such as deliberate manipulati­on of a virus in the lab to make it more dangerous to humans.

Nor did they find evidence of any virus strains that “could have plausibly served as a backbone” — that is, a biological foundation — for a geneticall­y engineered version.

The agencies examined one of the more popular claims by lab-leak proponents, involving the so-called furin cleavage site on SARS-COV-2. This is a feature of the virus’ spike, the structure that allows it to penetrate healthy cells and pass along infectious material. To be effective, the spike has to be cut in two, a process achieved by the enzyme furin.

Lab-leak proponents have asserted that the furin site is so rare and so well-adapted to human infection that it’s certain to have been added to the virus in a lab. Just as many academic virologist­s have noted, the report observes that furin sites have been found in naturally occurring viruses and can be the product of natural evolution.

The intelligen­ce services found support for the so-called zoonotic theory that the pandemic resulted from a natural spillover of the virus from animals to humans in virologica­l history. Many virologica­l outbreaks have happened this way, the report observes.

“Extensive wildlife and livestock farming, wildlife traffickin­g, and live animal markets in China,” along with historical­ly lax government oversight, “increase the probabilit­y that initial transmissi­on occurred along these lines.”

Support for the lab-leak hypothesis, the services say, comes chiefly from reports questionin­g whether the Wuhan institute conducted its research under adequate biological safeguards. But the services found “no indication­s that the institute’s research involved SARS-COV-2 or a close progenitor virus.”

The report does state that, among its contributi­ng agencies, four “assess with low confidence” that the virus probably sprung from natural sources; one finds with “moderate confidence” that the pandemic “most likely” resulted from a laboratory incident, and three couldn’t decide between the two theories. The report doesn’t link specific agencies to those findings, however.

The intelligen­ce services also reproach the Chinese government for hindering internatio­nal investigat­ions of COVID19’S origins, in part by refusing to share informatio­n about WIV research or its own findings about the early course of the disease in Wuhan.

“These actions reflect, in part, China’s government’s own uncertaint­y about where an investigat­ion could lead,” the U.S. report says, “as well as its frustratio­n the internatio­nal community is using the issue to exert political pressure on China.”

The services are generally dismissive of what it calls “open-source” theories of the pandemic’s origin, typically passed around on social media. “These theories generally do not provide diagnostic informatio­n on COVID-19 origins, and in some cases are not supported by the informatio­n available to us.”

Whether the government report will stifle the propaganda about a Chinese lableak is uncertain, but that may not be the way to bet. Too many people are ideologica­lly committed to the claim, and a scientific debunking of a theory that has had little science to support it from the start probably won’t matter.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States