Las Vegas Review-Journal

Diners shouldn’t have to hear kids’ toys

- JUDITH MARTIN MISS MANNERS

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I am all for children in casual restaurant­s. But there is one thing I cannot abide in a restaurant, and that is to hear kiddie animated movies, shows and video games with the audio on.

Now I will grant that the parents do keep the volume as low as possible, but apparently they think that makes it OK to run this stuff.

What is your take on this? Is it OK to have animated shows or games on in casual restaurant­s, even if the audio is low?

GENTLE READER:

Proper parents should therefore bring children’s headphones to apply to childish ears, whether the content is animated, live-action or, as Miss Manners would term such dubious entertainm­ent as videos of purchased goods being unpacked, inanimate.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: My husband and I are in our late 60s, and we have both been previously married. When we decided last year to get married, we wanted a no-frills occasion, so we decided to go to one of the Elvis chapels in Las Vegas.

We thought it would be a fun place to have a get-together with family. We called our relatives and close friends, and were surprised that 21 people wanted to come and share the day. We paid for the flights of our four kids. After the wedding, we decided to go out to eat with everyone. We all paid for our own dinners.

Six months later, my older brother came for a visit, and to my surprise, all of a sudden he asked me if my husband was cheap. I was so hurt. He said he thought we should have paid for everyone’s dinner that night.

It was over $800. We are comfortabl­e financiall­y, but not overly wealthy, and all who attended were financiall­y secure. This was not a reception, in our mind.

Do you think we should have paid for dinner?

GENTLE READER: Nursing a grudge is a time-consuming and delicate activity, so it does not surprise Miss Manners when people make a mess of it.

Certainly, your brother has. Perhaps there was a case to be made that the meal was your wedding reception, although it seems a stretch given the informalit­y displayed.

It in no way justifies harboring a grievance over a simple misunderst­anding for six months, making an accusation against your husband — and ignoring the larger context of this having been the wedding of his presumably beloved sister.

Any misunderst­anding was minor and not ill-intentione­d. It is your brother who is being ungenerous.

Submit your etiquette questions to Miss Manners at dearmissma­nners@gmail. com.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States