Las Vegas Review-Journal

Illegal mergers under scrutiny

Agencies seek public input on moves

- By Marcy Gordon

U.S. competitio­n regulators have mounted an effort to tighten enforcemen­t against illegal mergers, in line with President Joe Biden’s mandate for greater scrutiny to big business combinatio­ns.

The Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission announced Tuesday they are seeking public comment on how current merger guidelines can be updated to better detect and prevent illegal and anticompet­itive deals in an increasing­ly consolidat­ing corporate marketplac­e. The agencies are stressing the importance of robust competitio­n to the economy, workers, consumers and small businesses.

“Our country depends on competitio­n to drive progress, innovation, and prosperity,” said Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter, who heads the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “We need to understand why so many industries have too few competitor­s, and to think carefully about how to ensure our merger enforcemen­t tools are fit for purpose in the modern economy.”

In their request for public views on mergers, the regulators are stretching toward a broader definition of anticompet­itive conduct. They said they’re interested in aspects of competitio­n that the current merger guidelines may overlook, such as the impact on labor markets and other issues not tied to prices, like innovation and quality. The regulators also are looking for specific examples of mergers that have hurt competitio­n.

“Today the DOJ and FTC should begin to orient the U.S. government once again towards liberty and equitable democracy. The government’s antimonopo­ly guidelines provide a critical statement of how regulators view the nature of power,” Barry Lynn, executive director of the Open Markets Institute, said in a statement. The group advocates for stricter antitrust regulation.

The trend toward concentrat­ion began with a merger boom in the 1980s in corporate America that fattened profits for the dominant companies. Decisions by both Democratic and Republican administra­tions over the past 15 years have allowed most big mergers to sail through.

The regulators noted Tuesday that the ongoing merger surge was reflected in companies’ applicatio­ns to regulators for approval, which more than doubled from 2020 to 2021.

The latest eye-popping proposed merger landed Tuesday, with news that Microsoft is paying nearly $70 billion for Activision Blizzard, the maker of Candy Crush and Call of Duty, as it seeks an edge in the fiercely competitiv­e businesses of mobile gaming and virtual-reality technology.

The all-cash $68.7 billion deal must pass scrutiny from U.S. and European regulators in the coming months. If approved, it would turn Microsoft, maker of the Xbox gaming system, into one of the world’s largest video game companies.

Biden issued a sweeping executive order in July that highlighte­d outsized market power in industries including Big Tech, health care, airlines and agricultur­e.

Tuesday’s announceme­nt was made by Kanter and Lina Khan, the head of the FTC. Kanter, an antitrust lawyer who has opposed giant tech companies in private practices, took over the Justice antitrust division in November. Khan, who became head of the FTC in June, was an outspoken critic of Big Tech before entering the government.

 ?? Graeme Jennings The Associated Press ?? Lina Khan, nominee for head of the Federal Trade Commission, speaks during a Senate confirmati­on hearing April 21 on Capitol Hill in Washington.
Graeme Jennings The Associated Press Lina Khan, nominee for head of the Federal Trade Commission, speaks during a Senate confirmati­on hearing April 21 on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States