Las Vegas Review-Journal

Twitter’s verificati­on fee draws objections

Deadline to keep blue check mark Saturday

- By Matt O’brien

William Shatner, Monica Lewinsky and other prolific Twitter commentato­rs — some household names, others little-known journalist­s — could soon be losing the blue check marks that helped verify their identity on the social media platform.

They could get the marks back by paying up to $11 a month. But some longtime users, including 92-yearold Star Trek legend Shatner, have balked at buying the premium service championed by Twitter’s billionair­e owner and chief executive Elon Musk.

After months of delay, Musk is gleefully promising that Saturday is the deadline for celebritie­s, journalist­s and others who’d been verified for free to pony up or lose their legacy status.

After buying Twitter for $44 billion in October, Musk has been trying to boost the struggling platform’s revenue by pushing more people to pay for a premium subscripti­on. But his move also reflects his assertion that the blue verificati­on marks have become an undeserved or “corrupt” status symbol for elite personalit­ies and news reporters.

Along with verifying celebritie­s, one of Twitter’s main reasons to mark profiles with a free blue check mark starting about 14 years ago was to verify politician­s, activists and people who suddenly find themselves in the news, as well as little-known journalist­s at small publicatio­ns around the globe, as an extra tool to curb misinforma­tion coming from accounts that are impersonat­ing people.

Lewinsky tweeted a screenshot Sunday of all the people impersonat­ing her, including at least one who appears to have paid for a blue check mark.

Shatner, known for his irreverent humor, also tagged Musk with a complaint about the promised changes.

“I’ve been here for 15 years giving my (clock emoji) & witty thoughts all for bupkis,” he wrote. “Now you’re telling me that I have to pay for something you gave me for free?”

Musk responded that there shouldn’t be a different standard for celebritie­s. “It’s more about treating everyone equally,” Musk tweeted.

But while “the attention is reasonably on celebritie­s because of our culture,” the bigger concern for open government advocate Alex Howard, director of the Digital Democracy Project, is that impersonat­ors could more easily spread rumors and conspiraci­es that could move markets or harm democracie­s around the world.

“The reason verificati­on exists on this platform was not simply to designate people as notable or authoritie­s, but to prevent impersonat­ion,” Howard said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States