Poverty, not parenting, is why students are missing school

If you came from a family where going to school each day was a given, it’s easy to think the worst of parents whose kids are chronically absent. American students are missing school at alarmingly high rates, particularly since the pandemic, and educators say it’s not the result of widespread neglect by parents or guardians. Instead, there are too many families without the resources to get by, making daily attendance difficult.

Schools have been creative in dealing with chronic absenteeism, using new programs that reach out to struggling families and help them overcome barriers that keep their kids from getting to school every day.

Every effort to strengthen the relationship between schools and families is welcome. But a problem this size isn’t going to be solved on a case-by-case basis, and it cannot be left to the schools alone.

Nationwide last year, 27.8% of K-12 students missed more than 10% of the school year, down only slightly from 29.7% the previous year. However, the rate is twice as high for poor students as it is for their better-off counterparts.

It’s no surprise to the people who work with these families every day and know the challenges they face. Teachers and administrators say the kids who miss school often have difficult home lives. They may have to care for siblings or work a job to help out. Their parents, or the students themselves, may be dealing with physical and mental illness that is not getting the treatment it needs. Or they may be homeless, couch-surfing from one place to another to find shelter.

When simply finding food, shelter and care is an hour-by-hour struggle, getting to school some days becomes a low priority. Sometimes, with unstable transportation and housing, it’s impossible.

Schools have responded by reaching out to these families. It’s the right thing for schools to do, and it’s certainly appreciated by the families who are helped. It would be far more effective, however, to target the poverty. We allow this stark economic disadvantage to persist even though we have policy tools to fix it.

Millions of children were pulled out of poverty when the child tax credit was expanded during the pandemic. They were plunged back into poverty when the expanded credit was repealed in 2021; in all, the child poverty rate went from 5.2%, a historic low, to 12.4%.

Why are we surprised that more families are struggling to get by and to get their kids to school on a regular basis?

Congress could deal a significant blow to this problem, and many others stemming from the poverty rates we’ve enabled, if it just committed to a robust child tax credit that sufficiently targets vulnerable families.

An expanded credit has been included in federal budget discussions in Congress but hasn’t won support from Republicans.

Three years ago, one decision by Congress cut the child poverty rate in half, a resounding victory. It should have been the first step toward recognizing that the problem is poverty, not the people experiencing it, and that a relatively small amount of help for these families can go a long way.

Instead, Congress ended help for millions of families. Parents and kids who were just keeping their heads above water had a lifeline cut — and still we wonder why so many families are drowning.