Las Vegas Review-Journal

Republican­s already doubting election results

- Eugene Robinson Eugene Robinson is a columnist for The Washington Post.

Don’t say they didn’t warn us. If Donald Trump loses again to Joe Biden in November, the attempt by MAGA Republican­s to overturn the result — in essence, to negate the will of the voters — could be even worse than last time.

Trump’s denial of his 2020 defeat has had a deeply corrosive effect on our democracy, with a majority of Republican­s still deluded into believing the election was stolen. The damage might be ameliorate­d if prominent GOP officials, who do know better, at least expressed confidence in the democratic process and pledged to accept the outcome of this year’s vote, no matter who wins.

Surely, that’s not too much to ask of men and women who owe their jobs to the same electoral system that Trump claims is hopelessly corrupt. Right?

Wrong. Witness the pathetic performanc­e by Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., on NBC’S “Meet the Press” last week. Host Kristen Welker tried six times to get Scott to say, yes or no, whether he would accept the result of the November election. Scott refused to give an answer. Instead, he served up a heaping bowl of word salad, tossed with a vinaigrett­e of oil and ambition.

“This is an issue that is not an issue so I’m not going to make it an issue. ... At the end of the day, the 47th president of the United States will be President Donald Trump. And I’m excited to get back to low inflation, low unemployme­nt. ... I’m not going to answer your hypothetic­al question when, in fact, I believe the American people are speaking today on the results of the election.”

Scott’s evasivenes­s is understand­able because he is auditionin­g to be Trump’s running mate, but it is not excusable. He knows that cases of proven voter fraud — or even formally alleged voter fraud — are vanishingl­y rare. He knows that recounts and audits consistent­ly show that votes are tallied accurately. He knows that all the conspiracy theories about the 2020 election spun by MAGA fabulists such as Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell have been proved utterly false and, in some cases, expensivel­y defamatory. Still, with his nonanswers, the senator undermines the legitimacy of U.S. democracy.

Other Republican­s hoping to be Trump’s vice presidenti­al choice have been equally shameless. North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum was shifty on CNN’S “State of the Union” when asked about the possibilit­y of violence if Trump loses, declining to answer and instead saying he is “looking forward to next January when Vice President (Kamala) Harris certifies the election for Donald Trump.” Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., said she would have to “see if this is a legal and valid election” before voting to certify the November result.

And Rep. Byron Donalds, R-fla., went even further — all the way to 2028. He said if he were the sitting vice president at the time of that year’s election, he would decline to certify the results “if you have state officials who are violating the election law in their states.” In other words, he would do what Vice President Mike Pence quite properly refused to do: impose Trump’s will over that of the American people.

All of this could be written off as nothing more than politician­s being craven — hardly a new phenomenon — if not for the damage it does. A sobering study released last month by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University found that 62% of Republican­s and 22% of independen­ts believe Trump was the “legitimate” winner in 2020. Hardly any Democrats share that view.

Those “deniers” add up to about onethird of voters overall. If that much of the electorate believes a presidenti­al election was stolen — despite multiple recounts and dozens of court cases proving it was not — we have a serious problem.

The Johns Hopkins study concludes: “A political party that has undermined its own voters’ faith in elections is a destabiliz­ing force in a democracy — especially one in which only two parties are realistica­lly competing. The strong viewpoints that deniers hold, and the distinctiv­e identity that they have formed, demonstrat­e that reviving our democracy will require more than any given result at the ballot box, or providing accurate informatio­n to voters on how the election process works. It will require a functionin­g, responsibl­e conservati­ve party that still believes in democracy.”

No such party now exists in U.S. politics. And for that failing, Trump is only partly responsibl­e.

No one is forcing Republican­s such as Scott, Burgum, Stefanik and Donalds to pretend to believe Trump’s lies. No one is forcing them to weaken faith in our elections. Whatever happens in the days and weeks after Election Day, many leading Republican­s deserve to share the blame.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States