Lodi News-Sentinel

Napolitano ‘sorry’ for UC audit response

- By Sophia Bollag

SACRAMENTO — After a state audit found University of California administra­tors hid $175 million from the public while tuition increased, university system President Janet Napolitano apologized Tuesday for the way her office handled the investigat­ion but disputed several of the audit’s findings.

In an unusual show of bipartisan agreement, lawmakers from both parties said during a Tuesday hearing they are deeply troubled by the state auditor’s finding that the UC president’s office tried to interfere with the audit. Later in the hearing, several legislator­s said they appreciate­d Napolitano’s apology and her promise to implement the audit’s recommenda­tions.

Napolitano maintained that the money in reserves actually totals $38 million, which she described as a “prudent and reasonable” amount set aside for unexpected expenses. Most of the $175 million identified in the audit funds important university programs including research grants, Napolitano said.

She agreed her office should keep clearer budget plans and records, as the audit recommende­d.

State Auditor Elaine Howle told lawmakers she faced an unpreceden­ted lack of cooperatio­n from Napolitano’s office while it was under audit.

“I am sorry that we did it this way because it has ... detracted from the important fact that we accept the recommenda­tions in the audit report.” JANET NAPOLITANO UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA “This is unbelievab­le for an institutio­n that has in its hands the education of California students and hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money and student fees.” ASSEMBLYWO­MAN CATHARINE BAKER, R-DUBLIN

She detailed efforts by the office to edit responses from individual UC campuses to survey questions from auditors.

Napolitano’s office “inappropri­ately screened” the campuses’ responses and altered statements and ratings that were initially critical of the office, the audit said.

“We felt that the surveys didn’t reflect an independen­t voice from those campuses,” Howle told lawmakers at the hearing.

Napolitano said she coordinate­d with the individual campuses on their audit responses to ensure they were accurate.

“My team made the decision to work with our campuses to ensure they understood the purpose of the audit and the audit’s scope,” Napolitano said. “I am sorry that we did it this way because it has created the

wrong impression and detracted from the important fact that we accept the recommenda­tions in the audit report.”

Assemblyma­n Jose Medina said he found the auditor’s descriptio­n of interferen­ce by the president’s office particular­ly concerning.

“To interfere in that process, to me, is undefendab­le,” the Democrat from Riverside said. “I am extremely bothered that there was tampering.”

UC administra­tors amassed $175 million in undisclose­d surplus money over four years even as the university system raised tuition and asked the state for more funding, according to the audit released last week.

“They are not putting California students and families first, particular­ly with their budget,” said Assemblywo­man Catharine Baker, a Republican from Dublin in the eastern San Francisco Bay Area. “This is unbelievab­le for an institutio­n that

has in its hands the education of California students and hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money and student fees.”

In the report, Howle said state lawmakers should increase oversight of Napolitano’s office.

Baker and several other Republican lawmakers are asking for the Democratic­ally controlled Legislatur­e to subpoena financial records and communicat­ions related to the surplus money the audit identified.

The UC Board of Regents in January voted to increase in-state tuition and fees $336 next academic year. Some lawmakers called for a reversal of the tuition hike in the wake of the audit.

At the hearing, several students held up signs in the audience protesting the recent tuition hike and the audit’s findings. Some criticized the university’s tuition rates during the comment period at the end of the hearing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States