Lodi News-Sentinel

DOJ weighs in on free speech at UC Berkeley

- By Benjamin Oreskes

The Trump administra­tion is jumping into the fracas over free speech at the University of California, Berkeley.

The Justice Department on Thursday filed a statement of interest supporting two conservati­ve groups who sued the school last year. The groups alleged that administra­tors and campus events policy unfairly hampered their ability to book right-leaning speakers like Ann Coulter and ultimately led to the events being canceled or modified.

Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand wrote in a Fox News opinion piece that certain Berkeley policies relating to location restrictio­ns — among other things — are onerous and applied selectivel­y. “It doesn’t require much creativity to turn this policy into a heckler’s veto,” she wrote Thursday.

She criticized the policies of several colleges across the country but was sure to single out Berkeley.

“Free speech is under attack at college campuses across the country,” Brand wrote. “The problem is not limited to a few colleges barring radical speakers to avoid a riot. Universiti­es large and small, public and private, are restrictin­g students’ and professors’ speech or enabling others to silence speech with which they disagree.”

In its legal brief, the Justice Department took aim at the campus events policy, writing that the “allegation­s, if proven, would sufficient­ly demonstrat­e the high risk of viewpoint discrimina­tion inherent in the Policies’ grant to administra­tors of unchecked discretion over student-sponsored speech.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been outspoken on his department’s desire to protect free speech on college campuses. In a September speech at Georgetown University, Sessions poked fun at the fact that Berkeley offered counseling to anyone in the community in advance of conservati­ve speaker Ben Shapiro’s appearance on campus.

“In the end, Mr. Shapiro spoke to a packed house,” Sessions said. “And to my knowledge, no one fainted, no one was unsafe. No one needed counseling.”

Partly as a result of its liberal legacy, Berkeley last year became the center of a national conversati­on about free speech on college campuses. Controvers­ial rightwing speakers including Milo Yiannopoul­os, David Horowitz and Coulter all attempted to speak on campus and were met with protests, which sometimes turned violent.

After Coulter’s April appearance was scuttled, the Berkeley College Republican­s and the Young America’s Foundation sued university officials. That case was thrown out, but the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in November.

The lawsuit alleged that “though UC Berkeley promises its students an environmen­t that promotes free debate and the free exchange of ideas, it had breached this promise through the repressive actions of University administra­tors and campus police, who have systematic­ally and intentiona­lly suppressed constituti­onally-protected expression by Plaintiffs (and the many UC Berkeley students whose public policy viewpoints align with Plaintiffs), simply because that expression may anger or offend students, UC Berkeley administra­tors, and/or community members who do not share Plaintiffs’ viewpoints.”

Harmeet Dhillon, a lawyer representi­ng the plaintiffs, noted that the Department of Education’s general counsel signed the statement of interest. Dhillon said she hoped the university will conform its policies to the Constituti­on

“I’m glad the DOJ weighed in. It would have been a natural case for them take on their own,” she said. “I think it’s helpful. I mean it’s the United States supporting our position on a constituti­onal legal issue.”

In an emailed statement, Berkeley spokesman Dan Mogulof called the entire lawsuit “unfounded,” adding that political views don’t factor into who gets to speak on campus.

“The campus is committed to ensuring that student groups may hold events with speakers of their choosing, and it has expended significan­t resources to allow events to go forward without compromisi­ng the safety or security of the campus,” said Mogulof.

“This suit has already been dismissed by the court once. The campus will continue to vigorously defend itself against these allegation­s.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States