Lodi News-Sentinel

Unemployme­nt rate falls below 4 percent

- By Jim Puzzangher­a

For the first time since 2000, the U.S. unemployme­nt rate has fallen below 4 percent.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. labor market improved somewhat last month, adding a solid 164,000 net jobs while the unemployme­nt rate reached a new milestone, falling below 4 percent for the first time since 2000, the Labor Department said Friday.

But while job growth rebounded from a disappoint­ing March figure that was revised up Friday to 135,000, other aspects of the closely watched monthly report were lackluster. And the drop in the unemployme­nt rate was for a bad reason: The labor force shrank for the second month in a row.

Overall, the data show a labor market that remains resilient in the face of a potential global trade war but whose growth is slowing as the recovery from the Great Recession this month became the secondlong­est in U.S. history.

“This jobs report is truly a mixed bag,” said Mark Hamrick, senior economic analyst at financial informatio­n website Bankrate.com.

The April job gains were below analyst expectatio­ns of about 195,000. Still, with upward revisions of a total of 30,000 for February and March, job growth has averaged 200,000 a month this year — well above what’s needed to accommodat­e new entrants to the workforce

The 3.9 percent unemployme­nt rate in April set a new post-recession low. The rate hadn’t been below 4 percent since December 2000.

And the unemployme­nt rates for blacks and Latinos last month — 6.6 percent and 4.8 percent, respective­ly — were at their lowest levels since the Labor Department began tracking the figures in the early 1970s.

President Donald Trump touted the decline in the overall rate Friday.

“I thought the jobs report was very good. The big thing to me was cracking 4 (percent). That hasn’t been done in a long time,” Trump told reporters before departing the White House for a speech in Texas. “We’re (at) full employment. We’re doing great.”

But the reason the unemployme­nt rate dropped from 4.1 percent in March was because the labor force shrank by 236,000 people.

“That’s not good news,” said economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the conservati­ve-leaning American Action Forum think tank. While he acknowledg­ed there was symbolism in breaking 4 percent, Holtz-Eakin said it would be a positive developmen­t if the rate went down while the labor force was growing.

“It’s that horse race between jobs created and the (size of the) labor force, and we went the wrong way this time,” he said. Overall, he said he would grade the jobs report “a B in a world where we’d really like to see an A-plus.”

During the 2016 presidenti­al campaign, Trump disparaged government reports of a falling unemployme­nt rate as understati­ng the condition of the jobs market because so many Americans were not in the labor force.

“Our real unemployme­nt rate — in fact, I saw a chart the other day, our real unemployme­nt — because you have 90 million people that aren’t working, 93 million to be exact, if you start adding it up, our real unemployme­nt rate is 42 percent,” Trump told Time magazine in August 2016 when the Labor Department said the rate was 4.9 percent.

He was a referring to a monthly statistic of working-age Americans who are not in the labor force. It was 94.3 million in August 2016. Last month it was 95.7 million, up about 410,000 from March.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States