Lodi News-Sentinel

As more cities push for paid sick leave, states push back

- By Alayna Alvarez

A split is growing between cities that want to require private companies to give workers paid sick days and states that are determined to stop them.

In the last three years, a dozen states have banned localities from passing paid leave requiremen­ts, more than doubling to 22 the states that now outlaw such local ordinances. The push for so-called preemption laws is backed by the Koch brothers and the American Legislativ­e Exchange Council, a membership organizati­on of state legislator­s who favor limited government.

The state moves come in response to the increasing number of cities and counties passing paid sick days ordinances. Since 2015, more than 20 cities, as well as eight states, have approved measures mandating that companies provide local workers with paid sick leave. Since San Francisco approved the first paid sick leave ordinance in 2006, paid sick day requiremen­ts have been passed in 35 cities or counties and 11 states.

Backers of required sick leave say they're giving an essential health benefit to workers — one that will improve public health by keeping ill employees at home. Opponents say paid sick leave will cost employers too much, and that a patchwork of conflictin­g local and state policies will only cause confusion.

"There's a real pitched battle going on in a lot of places right now between cities that have decided that they really want to protect workers' rights and workers' health, and state legislatur­es that don't want to interfere with businesses at all," said Sherry Leiwant, cofounder and co-president of A Better Balance, a New Yorkbased group that supports paid leave. "We're seeing that more and more, and I think we're going to keep seeing that."

The United States is the only developed country without a national paid leave law, says the Internatio­nal Labour Organizati­on, a United Nations agency. Nearly a third of all workers in the United States don't have paid sick days, according to the American Journal of Orthopsych­iatry. Yet, bipartisan support for the benefits is higher than ever. Ninety-four percent of Democratic voters and nearly 80 percent of Republican voters favor paid sick leave laws, according to a 2015 New York Times-CBS News poll.

A handful of states that prohibit local sick leave ordinances, including Maryland, Oregon, Rhode Island and New Jersey, do require businesses to provide sick leave, but bar cities from going beyond the state requiremen­ts. Other states, such as Wisconsin, don't have a state rule and prohibit cities from passing their own.

In 2008, voters in Milwaukee approved a paid sick leave measure with support from nearly 70 percent of voters, making the city the third in the country, behind San Francisco and Washington, D.C., to approve one. But in 2011, newly elected Republican Gov. Scott Walker and the GOP-led Legislatur­e reversed the Milwaukee measure and approved a law to preempt other Wisconsin cities from following its lead.

The clash over paid sick leave is part of a broader divide between conservati­ve states and their more liberal cities on a wide range of issues, including minimum wage laws, fracking, plastic bag bans, municipal broadband and anti-discrimina­tion ordinances that protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgende­r residents.

In September, in a political maneuver that some called unpreceden­ted, Michigan lawmakers enacted a law requiring paid sick days only to block a similar ballot initiative from being put to voters Nov. 6. The Republican-led Legislatur­e likely will roll back the measure.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States