Lodi News-Sentinel

Lodi Council sends letter to Bureau of Cannabis Control

- By Oula Miqbel NEWS-SENTINEL STAFF WRITER

Despite the popularity of California Propositio­n 64, the Marijuana Legalizati­on Initiative, which was passed in November of 2016, Lodi City Council voted in favor of requesting communicat­ion from the League of California Cities, pressing the Bureau of Cannabis Control and the newly proposed regulation­s.

After the passage of Propositio­n 64, there is still too much left to be understood that worries the Lodi City Council, who have taken a staunch approach to expressing the disapprova­l of the passage. In a special city council meeting on Thursday evening, they voted to send a formal grievance, along with several cities, because of the adjustment­s made by the Bureau of Cannabis Control.

The council wrote a letter to Lori Ajax, chief of the Bureau of Cannabis Control concerning the proposed revisions to the propositio­n. Previously there was a stipulatio­n in the propositio­n that allowed “local government­s” to regulate the limitation­s on cannabis deliveries and the timelines to review license applicatio­ns, and provisiona­ry amendments made by the Bureau

Under the first provision of section 5416 (d) Removal of Limitation­s on Cannabis Deliveries: “local government­s” are no longer able to restrict the delivery of cannabis, and cannabis products, according to the letter, “this would mean that it strips local government­s of the ability to prohibit cannabis deliveries, and prevents local government­s from regulating deliveries.”

Overstretc­h that this poses on local government­s operates it in direct contrast to the language of the propositio­ns intent as it was posed at the time of voting, according to the letter. “It was understood by California’s voters, that Propositio­n 64 preserved local control, regarding the delivery of cannabis,” as stated in the letter.

In the letter, Lodi City Council is quoted as stating, “This provision undermines the very foundation of local control and imposes a ‘one size fits all’ form of cannabis regulation. Instead (it) creates a new cannabis policy outside of the legislativ­e process”

The second addition, located in section 5002(c) (28)The Timelines for Adequate Local Government Review, was

changed from a 60-day review to a 10-day review. The shift in dates allotted for review hinder the process in which it can properly be reviewed and decisions can be rendered, regarding the adjustment­s and additions made by local government­s, according to the letter.

The various revisions, “are far more than technical and clarifying.” it suggested through the letter that “the Bureau of Cannabis Control is limiting the opportunit­y for the public to provide feedback.”

In a statement made in the address put forward by Mayor Alan Nakanishi, it is “For these reasons, the City of Lodi respectful­ly opposes these regulation­s until such time as they are revised or removed to address the concerns listed above. We look forward to continued opportunit­ies to comment on specific regulatory proposals”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States