Lodi News-Sentinel

Trump should channel his inner George Washington

- JOHN BURTKA John Burtka is executive director of The American Conservati­ve. Reach him on Twitter: @jburtkaIV.

In President Donald Trump’s inaugural address, he surveyed the nation’s landscape — crumbling infrastruc­ture, leaky borders, costly wars, deadly deindustri­alization and divisive identity politics — and in one infamous phrase, described “American carnage.” Rejecting a 30-year bipartisan consensus driven by post-Cold War optimism, middle Americans wanted to take the country back from coastal elites, and they handed Trump the task.

As the president puts the final touches on Tuesday’s State of the Union, he should direct his attention to the timeless wisdom of our nation’s first president, George Washington, whose public speeches cast a winning vision of an “America First” policy agenda.

George Washington’s major addresses express three principal aims for making and keeping America great: unity, safety and happiness. In light of the recent government shutdown and a growing sense of division among Americans, this threefold formula provides Trump with a blueprint for a majority coalition in 2020.

The first of these virtues is the imperative of recovering a sense of American unity. Washington might respond to our crisis by reminding us of the “immense value of (our) national union to (our) collective and individual happiness,” even going so far as to describe it as “the palladium of (our) political safety and prosperity.” His message of unity and his admonition to frown upon “...every attempt to alienate any portion of the country from the rest,” speaks loud and clear to a country undergoing what has been described as a Cold Civil War.

For Washington, regional difference­s and “local discrimina­tions,” as important as they are, come second to “the name of American,” which binds us together as a whole and sovereign people. Trump would do well to embrace a more-Washington­ian sense of nationalis­m that seeks to strengthen the “sacred ties” that unite our “indissolub­le community of interest.” This approach could be particular­ly helpful if he wanted to frame his immigratio­n policy in a positive manner by demonstrat­ing how slower rates of immigratio­n could benefit immigrants by affording them greater opportunit­y to integrate into the political community and move up the ladder of economic opportunit­y.

A united people cannot remain a free people unless they are a safe people, which brings us to the second virtue. In Washington’s mind, our national security depends on political and economic independen­ce and a firm sense of the national interest, informed by justice and humanity.

There is no such thing as freedom without independen­ce. In foreign affairs, Washington called on every “real patriot” to resist “the insidious wiles of foreign influence.” And while Washington was supportive of a prudential trade policy based upon “experience and circumstan­ce,” he would likely have been sympatheti­c to Trump’s protection­ist agenda vis-a-vis foreign adversarie­s as he himself urged Congress to strengthen American manufactur­ing in such a way that secured our economic independen­ce “for essential, particular­ly military, supplies.”

Washington praised the neutrality afforded by our geographic position and begged posterity to steer clear of “foreign entangleme­nts” in order to protect Americans from debt and the threat of an “overgrown military establishm­ent... hostile to republican liberty.” If Trump truly wants to bring our troops home from Syria and Afghanista­n and support domestic manufactur­ing, then he should defend his “America First” policies by situating his ideas within the context of a much greater tradition of American safety and independen­ce championed by our most prudent and popular statesman.

Third, George Washington held a firm belief that our government existed to promote the happiness of the American people. His conception of freedom was not utopian — it was meant to serve the “general good,” “public interest” and “national happiness” of the whole citizenry. Washington’s constituti­onal government was strong, limited, and ordered towards the common good and national interest.

Our first president believed that we should use all legitimate instrument­s of power to secure the political, economic, and moral happiness of the American people. If Trump, who likely agrees, wants to compete with progressiv­es who have no qualms about ordering society towards their vision of human flourishin­g, then he must take Washington’s example and begin to advance a bold, conservati­ve vision of the common good. Such a program would help to widen his base of support and include some of his most winsome ideas: an infrastruc­ture plan to rebuild roads, bridges, and transporta­tion systems; paid family leave to support working mothers; and vigorous antitrust enforcemen­t to bust up corporate monopolies and promote entreprene­urship.

If Donald Trump fails to defend national unity, safety, and happiness in his last two years as president, the mantle of leadership will pass to someone Americans will find even more radical to save them from the wreckage caused by the failed policies of the ruling class. With the clock ticking, he would do well to channel his inner George Washington, the man who made America great from the beginning.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States