Lodi News-Sentinel

White House waivers override regulation­s guarding environmen­t

- By Anna M. Phillips and Molly O’Toole

WASHINGTON — Over the last week, Marianna Trevino Wright has watched work crews drive through her butterfly sanctuary in the Rio Grande Valley to a nearby site where brush is being cleared for a planned six-mile stretch of border wall.

Homeland Security has planned to build an 18-foottall steel and concrete barrier across the National Butterfly Center, cutting it in half. Those plans were blocked, at least for now, in the spending bill that Congress passed and President Donald Trump signed Friday, which specifical­ly bars constructi­on at the 100-acre site.

It wasn’t immediatel­y clear if Trump’s declaratio­n of a national emergency on the border would upend that ban.

Federal authoritie­s have provided no environmen­tal impact study for erecting a barrier in the middle of a wildlife refuge. Nor has the government analyzed how much damage the spotlights, heavy machinery and foot traffic would do to endangered species in the area.

Under Trump, the secretary of Homeland Security has repeatedly invoked a little-known waiver to cast aside federal environmen­tal and public notice laws that could block or slow border barrier constructi­on — more than under any other administra­tion.

Citing national security, the Trump administra­tion has issued six such waivers for replacemen­t fencing and barrier projects in the last two years, bypassing the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air Act, the National Environmen­tal Policy Act and other regulation­s that the department would be forced to consider for any other public works project.

That compares to five such waivers issued during President George W. Bush’s eight years in office, and none under Presidents Obama and Clinton. Congress created the waiver authority in 1996.

“It is breathtaki­ng just how easy it is for them to waive these laws,” said Laiken Jordahl, an environmen­tal advocate with the Center for Biological Diversity. “As environmen­tal litigators, that’s our entire toolkit, and we can’t use any of them here.”

At a time when federal courts have delayed or struck down many of the administra­tion’s efforts to roll back environmen­tal regulation­s, the waiver has become a reliable way to ensure the president’s long-promised border wall is not derailed by environmen­tal lawsuits.

Waivers almost certainly will be used after Trump declared a national emergency from the White House Rose Garden on Friday, then signed a bill to keep the government open.

The bill includes $1.375 billion for about 55 miles of fencing in the Rio Grande Valley, as well as specific protection­s for the butterfly refuge and several other areas.

Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s acting chief of staff, told reporters Trump would use the national emergency declaratio­n to tap $6.6 billion in other federal accounts to build his border wall, likely setting up a court battle over the proposed new constructi­on.

On Thursday, House Democrats introduced several other measures that would remove the government’s ability to unilateral­ly waive environmen­tal laws for border wall constructi­on.

Kirstjen Nielsen, secretary of Homeland Security, most recently issued a waiver on Feb. 8 to speed constructi­on of 14 miles of replacemen­t fence in San Diego, bypassing 36 separate federal environmen­tal and historic preservati­on laws.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States